Fizzvs Rammus
Fizz vs Rammus is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Fizz wins with a 57.1% win rate (+14.3%) over Rammus based on 21 games. Rammus wins the early laning phase while Fizz scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Rammus matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Rammus(57.1%)Who Wins the Fizz vs Rammus Matchup?
Fizz vs Rammus Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Rammus matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 21 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 57.1% win rate compared to Rammus's 42.9%, giving Fizz a 14.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Rammus controls the early laning stage, but Fizz outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Rammus needs to press advantages before Fizz reaches their power spikes, while Fizz should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Rammus leads by 1,400 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz players can confidently pick into Rammus and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Rammus away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Rammus Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Rammus, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Rammus
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Rammus, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Rammus are Shadowflame, Lich Bane and Rabadon's Deathcap. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Rammus. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Rammus matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz45.5%Rammus54.5%Fizz70.0%Rammus30.0%Rammus dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 54.5% win rate — a 9.1 percentage point lead over Fizz. This lopsided early game means Rammus can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 70.0% win rate — 40.0 points above Rammus. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Rammus must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Fizz reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Fizz survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Fizz Runes Against Rammus
Precision
Domination
Running Precision primary with Domination secondary allows Fizz to press their advantage against Rammus, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.24% | 369 | 6.1 | 819 | 12,543 | 45.2% | 50.8% | |
| 51.40% | 321 | 6.0 | 819 | 12,019 | 48.2% | 55.0% | |
| 47.33% | 243 | 6.2 | 844 | 12,846 | 54.8% | 41.7% | |
| 54.30% | 221 | 6.4 | 803 | 12,949 | 53.2% | 55.1% | |
| 55.90% | 195 | 5.9 | 906 | 12,621 | 55.2% | 56.5% | |
| 46.45% | 184 | 5.7 | 779 | 12,951 | 48.2% | 45.0% | |
| 51.65% | 184 | 5.5 | 790 | 12,149 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 52.35% | 171 | 4.5 | 747 | 12,163 | 45.5% | 58.1% | |
| 59.15% | 166 | 4.3 | 842 | 13,063 | 59.7% | 58.6% | |
| 56.52% | 161 | 6.0 | 866 | 13,291 | 55.6% | 57.3% | |
| 58.22% | 147 | 6.0 | 802 | 13,083 | 53.2% | 61.9% | |
| 55.32% | 141 | 5.8 | 849 | 12,958 | 50.0% | 59.5% | |
| 52.52% | 139 | 5.8 | 750 | 12,622 | 58.2% | 48.8% | |
| 59.12% | 137 | 6.5 | 813 | 13,196 | 62.5% | 56.2% | |
| 52.59% | 136 | 6.1 | 759 | 12,033 | 57.6% | 47.8% | |
| 49.22% | 128 | 4.9 | 857 | 12,598 | 56.7% | 42.6% | |
| 54.40% | 127 | 4.3 | 803 | 13,532 | 55.7% | 53.1% | |
| 51.22% | 123 | 6.1 | 724 | 11,714 | 53.2% | 49.2% | |
| 41.67% | 121 | 1.3 | 705 | 13,048 | 37.5% | 45.3% | |
| 55.83% | 120 | 5.8 | 825 | 12,337 | 52.0% | 58.6% | |
| 55.08% | 118 | 6.3 | 941 | 13,041 | 70.2% | 45.1% | |
| 50.00% | 102 | 6.1 | 842 | 12,756 | 53.3% | 47.4% | |
| 50.00% | 96 | 6.6 | 863 | 13,180 | 59.1% | 42.3% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 6.1 | 767 | 12,478 | 54.2% | 48.9% | |
| 42.39% | 93 | 1.5 | 720 | 13,466 | 41.7% | 42.9% | |
| 49.44% | 92 | 1.4 | 687 | 12,961 | 48.8% | 50.0% | |
| 56.04% | 91 | 6.1 | 850 | 12,289 | 60.9% | 51.1% | |
| 46.59% | 88 | 6.2 | 767 | 11,890 | 48.8% | 44.7% | |
| 49.43% | 87 | 6.0 | 798 | 12,261 | 58.5% | 41.3% | |
| 38.37% | 86 | 1.0 | 667 | 13,001 | 33.3% | 42.0% | |
| 49.40% | 83 | 5.9 | 788 | 12,329 | 41.5% | 57.1% | |
| 49.37% | 80 | 5.2 | 862 | 12,847 | 53.9% | 45.0% | |
| 46.84% | 79 | 6.4 | 833 | 12,325 | 38.9% | 53.5% | |
| 52.56% | 79 | 1.1 | 771 | 14,010 | 54.8% | 51.1% | |
| 51.28% | 78 | 1.6 | 790 | 13,999 | 54.0% | 48.8% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 1.7 | 764 | 13,083 | 51.2% | 50.0% | |
| 46.75% | 77 | 5.7 | 754 | 12,164 | 50.0% | 45.3% | |
| 56.58% | 76 | 6.3 | 896 | 12,062 | 52.9% | 59.5% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 1.8 | 800 | 12,918 | 44.8% | 47.5% | |
| 59.02% | 63 | 3.7 | 775 | 12,343 | 62.5% | 55.2% | |
| 55.56% | 63 | 6.1 | 889 | 12,483 | 65.4% | 48.6% | |
| 52.46% | 61 | 4.4 | 809 | 12,648 | 66.7% | 38.7% | |
| 42.37% | 60 | 5.9 | 857 | 12,491 | 41.9% | 42.9% | |
| 50.85% | 60 | 5.8 | 849 | 12,775 | 55.0% | 48.7% | |
| 52.54% | 59 | 1.3 | 800 | 13,204 | 51.9% | 53.1% | |
| 47.17% | 53 | 1.1 | 718 | 12,912 | 47.8% | 46.7% | |
| 51.92% | 53 | 6.4 | 803 | 12,626 | 60.9% | 44.8% | |
| 58.82% | 52 | 1.1 | 747 | 13,772 | 40.9% | 72.4% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 5.4 | 845 | 13,822 | 65.2% | 37.9% | |
| 53.06% | 50 | 1.2 | 835 | 13,393 | 65.0% | 44.8% | |
| 33.33% | 49 | 1.2 | 720 | 13,642 | 35.3% | 32.3% | |
| 50.00% | 49 | 5.9 | 844 | 13,459 | 54.5% | 46.1% | |
| 29.79% | 48 | 1.2 | 747 | 12,634 | 30.4% | 29.2% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 1.3 | 828 | 13,831 | 41.7% | 41.7% | |
| 54.35% | 46 | 1.9 | 801 | 14,003 | 45.8% | 63.6% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 6.3 | 828 | 13,489 | 44.4% | 63.0% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 5.3 | 853 | 13,207 | 65.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 1.8 | 652 | 12,035 | 36.8% | 43.5% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 1.4 | 769 | 13,128 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 1.3 | 739 | 12,058 | 46.1% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 2.8 | 832 | 14,857 | 63.6% | 44.8% | |
| 62.50% | 40 | 5.5 | 781 | 12,083 | 72.2% | 54.5% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.9 | 842 | 12,403 | 53.9% | 51.9% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 1.0 | 761 | 15,037 | 69.2% | 55.6% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 1.5 | 762 | 12,869 | 55.0% | 47.4% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 6.2 | 840 | 11,648 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 4.0 | 696 | 13,044 | 52.9% | 50.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 4.1 | 764 | 12,974 | 58.8% | 35.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 2.6 | 750 | 13,852 | 35.7% | 52.2% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 5.6 | 944 | 13,766 | 50.0% | 59.1% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 4.6 | 800 | 12,624 | 62.5% | 45.0% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 1.0 | 708 | 12,241 | 62.5% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 5.8 | 852 | 13,318 | 60.0% | 45.8% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 3.9 | 802 | 11,701 | 41.2% | 43.8% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.5 | 775 | 14,087 | 58.3% | 45.0% | |
| 67.74% | 32 | 5.3 | 782 | 13,111 | 61.5% | 72.2% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 2.0 | 834 | 14,050 | 36.4% | 52.4% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.1 | 783 | 13,525 | 53.9% | 38.9% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 5.5 | 817 | 11,348 | 33.3% | 55.6% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.3 | 766 | 15,397 | 71.4% | 47.6% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 2.2 | 789 | 12,815 | 42.9% | 30.8% | |
| 70.37% | 27 | 4.8 | 777 | 12,473 | 90.9% | 56.3% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 1.1 | 680 | 13,576 | 46.1% | 28.6% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 2.2 | 816 | 14,253 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 1.9 | 699 | 12,777 | 53.3% | 20.0% | |
| 47.83% | 24 | 2.2 | 804 | 13,482 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.5 | 793 | 13,487 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.5 | 788 | 13,128 | 54.5% | 46.1% | |
| 61.90% | 22 | 4.1 | 715 | 11,569 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 47.62% | 22 | 1.2 | 636 | 12,430 | 54.5% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.0 | 834 | 12,840 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 6.0 | 803 | 13,612 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.4 | 799 | 14,489 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.2 | 854 | 12,808 | 45.5% | 70.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 2.1 | 792 | 13,031 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 2.8 | 805 | 12,971 | 60.0% | 72.7% | |
| 36.84% | 20 | 1.5 | 585 | 12,767 | 23.1% | 66.7% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 0.9 | 781 | 11,683 | 52.9% | 66.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.6 | 774 | 13,331 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 47.06% | 18 | 5.9 | 967 | 12,533 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.2 | 922 | 13,413 | 77.8% | 55.6% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 1.2 | 745 | 12,401 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 17 | 5.7 | 890 | 13,685 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.5 | 876 | 13,455 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.3 | 876 | 11,808 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.5 | 805 | 12,087 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 2.8 | 706 | 12,581 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 2.9 | 761 | 14,095 | 83.3% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 0.9 | 747 | 11,660 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.6 | 814 | 13,896 | 33.3% | 45.5% | |
| 66.67% | 13 | 5.8 | 849 | 11,394 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.2 | 787 | 11,704 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.3 | 854 | 12,529 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 5.6 | 968 | 11,781 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.5 | 717 | 12,662 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.5 | 830 | 12,565 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.7 | 858 | 13,266 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 781 | 12,828 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 734 | 10,226 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.0 | 939 | 12,468 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.4 | 829 | 12,939 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.1 | 780 | 13,079 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.7 | 744 | 13,505 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 9 | 1.2 | 672 | 12,677 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 5.2 | 848 | 13,422 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 691 | 12,493 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.0 | 654 | 11,213 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 755 | 15,214 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.8 | 844 | 12,489 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.8 | 832 | 12,700 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 4.3 | 1,055 | 13,918 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 703 | 11,999 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 80.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,069 | 14,765 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 639 | 11,309 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 879 | 14,052 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 1,025 | 14,690 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 825 | 12,996 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Rammus - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Rammus in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Fizz vs Rammus matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to Rammus's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 21 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Fizz do against Rammus in the early game?
In the early game, Rammus has the advantage against Fizz with a 54.5% win rate versus 45.5%. Rammus players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Rammus in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Fizz vs Rammus matchup with a 70.0% win rate compared to 30.0%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Rammus matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Rammus with a 57.1% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 14.3 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 21 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Rammus?
The best Fizz build against Rammus includes Shadowflame, Lich Bane, Rabadon's Deathcap with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Rammus?
The best Fizz runes against Rammus use the Precision primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Rammus matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Rammus?
Yes, Fizz has a favorable matchup against Rammus with a 57.1% win rate. Fizz strongly counters Rammus in lane based on current patch 26.4 data.
How do I play Fizz against Rammus?
When playing Fizz against Rammus, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Rammus. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.