
Fizz vs Quinn is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.16. Fizz wins with a 55.6% win rate (+11.1%) over Quinn based on 9 games. Fizz holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Quinn matchup.
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.

The Fizz vs Quinn matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 9 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 55.6% win rate compared to Quinn's 44.4%, giving Fizz a 11.1 percentage point advantage. Fizz dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Quinn players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Quinn leads by 0.4s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz players can confidently pick into Quinn and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Quinn away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Quinn, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Quinn, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Quinn are Zhonya's Hourglass, Nashor's Tooth and Rabadon's Deathcap. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Quinn matchup.
The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Fizz and Quinn, with Fizz holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Quinn. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Fizz holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Quinn players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Fizz to press their advantage against Quinn, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.16. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 190 | 6.0 | 866 | 12,920 | 57.3% | 45.2% | |
| 54.29% | 175 | 5.9 | 819 | 12,276 | 63.0% | 46.8% | |
| 52.50% | 160 | 5.8 | 861 | 12,945 | 58.0% | 48.4% | |
| 50.00% | 152 | 6.0 | 826 | 12,537 | 47.1% | 52.4% | |
| 48.97% | 145 | 6.0 | 823 | 12,791 | 50.0% | 48.1% | |
| 54.55% | 132 | 6.0 | 932 | 12,890 | 55.8% | 53.8% | |
| 51.26% | 119 | 5.9 | 933 | 13,552 | 50.0% | 52.2% | |
| 47.22% | 108 | 5.7 | 795 | 13,051 | 55.9% | 43.2% | |
| 46.23% | 106 | 5.4 | 868 | 12,224 | 34.0% | 55.9% | |
| 47.06% | 102 | 5.7 | 815 | 12,114 | 44.7% | 49.1% | |
| 48.51% | 101 | 6.0 | 798 | 12,715 | 45.0% | 50.8% | |
| 48.51% | 101 | 5.9 | 817 | 13,003 | 45.2% | 50.9% | |
| 63.04% | 92 | 5.7 | 920 | 12,953 | 62.5% | 63.5% | |
| 64.94% | 77 | 6.1 | 874 | 13,685 | 76.7% | 57.5% | |
| 51.32% | 76 | 5.3 | 966 | 13,461 | 50.0% | 52.3% | |
| 48.65% | 74 | 5.7 | 793 | 13,181 | 33.3% | 59.1% | |
| 50.68% | 73 | 5.6 | 945 | 11,549 | 55.6% | 46.0% | |
| 43.06% | 72 | 5.6 | 844 | 12,661 | 47.1% | 39.5% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 5.7 | 872 | 13,367 | 34.6% | 53.5% | |
| 44.12% | 68 | 5.7 | 834 | 12,036 | 48.5% | 40.0% | |
| 46.27% | 67 | 5.9 | 843 | 12,589 | 41.4% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 60 | 6.3 | 827 | 13,035 | 36.4% | 42.1% | |
| 57.89% | 57 | 5.4 | 827 | 12,861 | 47.6% | 63.9% | |
| 59.26% | 54 | 5.9 | 874 | 12,700 | 60.0% | 58.6% | |
| 48.08% | 52 | 5.7 | 893 | 13,823 | 29.4% | 57.1% | |
| 67.35% | 49 | 5.8 | 849 | 12,612 | 63.6% | 70.4% | |
| 61.36% | 44 | 6.4 | 930 | 13,177 | 77.3% | 45.5% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 6.4 | 859 | 12,344 | 40.9% | 50.0% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 6.1 | 949 | 13,236 | 68.4% | 31.8% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 6.0 | 872 | 12,004 | 50.0% | 61.5% | |
| 71.05% | 38 | 5.5 | 860 | 12,190 | 78.3% | 60.0% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 5.8 | 812 | 12,441 | 57.1% | 42.1% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 5.0 | 808 | 12,039 | 47.1% | 28.6% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 5.8 | 738 | 12,562 | 58.3% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 5.3 | 870 | 12,597 | 54.5% | 47.1% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.0 | 975 | 14,485 | 69.2% | 33.3% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 5.7 | 854 | 12,483 | 38.5% | 46.1% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 891 | 13,742 | 12.5% | 58.8% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 5.4 | 759 | 13,102 | 61.5% | 41.7% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.1 | 943 | 11,193 | 25.0% | 61.5% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 6.3 | 1,022 | 13,354 | 40.0% | 61.5% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 5.1 | 806 | 12,365 | 28.6% | 73.3% | |
| 77.27% | 22 | 5.5 | 882 | 13,143 | 80.0% | 76.5% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 5.5 | 979 | 12,433 | 50.0% | 27.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.1 | 835 | 12,878 | 80.0% | 53.9% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.3 | 798 | 14,266 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 25.00% | 16 | 6.2 | 808 | 10,430 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 5.7 | 814 | 12,728 | 80.0% | 54.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.3 | 911 | 14,771 | 100.0% | 58.3% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 4.1 | 712 | 12,552 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.7 | 600 | 12,642 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 4.7 | 893 | 13,147 | 20.0% | 44.4% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.6 | 940 | 13,342 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 4.0 | 784 | 11,454 | 83.3% | 14.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.6 | 697 | 15,730 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.5 | 983 | 14,690 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.4 | 775 | 12,325 | 20.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.0 | 1,099 | 13,943 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.8 | 707 | 9,934 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.0 | 824 | 13,318 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.5 | 848 | 11,897 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 6.2 | 846 | 13,100 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.4 | 700 | 11,688 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.8 | 991 | 14,976 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 90.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 902 | 15,011 | 100.0% | 87.5% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 921 | 12,685 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.1 | 874 | 9,378 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.3 | 861 | 14,222 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.3 | 847 | 12,147 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.9 | 941 | 14,425 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.3 | 805 | 14,899 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.7 | 918 | 12,320 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.8 | 768 | 14,493 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.1 | 671 | 12,422 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.7 | 653 | 11,188 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 789 | 11,561 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.4 | 935 | 13,040 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.2 | 685 | 13,345 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.8 | 713 | 11,612 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 4.9 | 694 | 11,574 | 80.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.4 | 980 | 14,331 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.8 | 750 | 15,494 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.8 | 646 | 13,490 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.0 | 695 | 10,441 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.3 | 843 | 12,036 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.0 | 790 | 14,821 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.9 | 855 | 12,453 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 503 | 9,078 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 0.9 | 683 | 12,179 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.1 | 632 | 12,462 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 829 | 13,712 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 0.8 | 813 | 12,711 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 923 | 12,988 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 725 | 10,668 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 904 | 12,346 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 842 | 15,657 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 839 | 12,322 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 958 | 12,312 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz wins the Fizz vs Quinn matchup with a 55.6% win rate compared to Quinn's 44.4%, a 11.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 9 recent ranked games in patch 26.16.
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Quinn with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Fizz vs Quinn matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Fizz wins the matchup against Quinn with a 55.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.16. The 11.1 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 9 games analyzed.
The best Fizz build against Quinn includes Zhonya's Hourglass, Nashor's Tooth, Rabadon's Deathcap with Sorcerer's Shoes. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
The best Fizz runes against Quinn use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Quinn matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Yes, Fizz has a favorable matchup against Quinn with a 55.6% win rate. Fizz strongly counters Quinn in lane based on current patch 26.16 data.
When playing Fizz against Quinn, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.