Fizzvs Xin Zhao
Fizz vs Xin Zhao is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Xin Zhao wins with a 75.0% win rate (+50.0%) over Fizz based on 12 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Xin Zhao scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Xin Zhao(25.0%)Who Wins the Fizz vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Fizz vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 12 recent matches analyzed, Xin Zhao wins with a 75.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 25.0%, giving Xin Zhao a 50.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Xin Zhao outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Xin Zhao reaches their power spikes, while Xin Zhao should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Xin Zhao leads by 933 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Xin Zhao has a strong advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Xin Zhao overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Xin Zhao
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Xin Zhao are Zhonya's Hourglass, Nashor's Tooth and Dusk and Dawn. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 4 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz60.0%Xin Zhao40.0%Fizz0.0%Xin Zhao100.0%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 60.0% win rate — a 20.0 percentage point lead over Xin Zhao. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Xin Zhao is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Xin Zhao, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Fizz must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Xin Zhao reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Xin Zhao survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Fizz Runes Against Xin Zhao
Precision
Resolve
The Precision and Resolve rune setup gives Fizz the best tools to compete against Xin Zhao in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.69% | 161 | 6.1 | 836 | 12,638 | 52.4% | 46.8% | |
| 58.60% | 157 | 6.0 | 831 | 12,412 | 60.3% | 57.0% | |
| 57.27% | 110 | 6.2 | 753 | 12,604 | 58.3% | 56.5% | |
| 39.42% | 104 | 5.9 | 835 | 12,289 | 47.2% | 31.4% | |
| 48.31% | 89 | 5.7 | 734 | 12,636 | 50.0% | 47.1% | |
| 64.04% | 89 | 5.8 | 914 | 13,301 | 57.5% | 69.4% | |
| 48.28% | 87 | 5.9 | 909 | 12,215 | 51.2% | 45.6% | |
| 60.24% | 83 | 6.0 | 858 | 12,598 | 53.9% | 65.9% | |
| 62.20% | 82 | 6.1 | 878 | 13,344 | 62.9% | 61.7% | |
| 46.25% | 80 | 6.0 | 796 | 12,292 | 51.4% | 41.9% | |
| 57.33% | 75 | 6.1 | 859 | 13,747 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.67% | 75 | 5.4 | 733 | 12,182 | 51.4% | 50.0% | |
| 52.05% | 73 | 5.8 | 746 | 11,998 | 57.5% | 45.5% | |
| 49.30% | 71 | 5.6 | 880 | 12,868 | 23.1% | 64.4% | |
| 64.29% | 70 | 6.3 | 707 | 11,852 | 60.6% | 67.6% | |
| 45.45% | 66 | 5.7 | 795 | 12,481 | 44.8% | 46.0% | |
| 40.00% | 65 | 5.6 | 862 | 12,739 | 51.4% | 26.7% | |
| 45.61% | 57 | 5.0 | 847 | 12,022 | 38.9% | 57.1% | |
| 50.88% | 57 | 6.2 | 905 | 13,750 | 60.0% | 46.0% | |
| 36.54% | 52 | 5.9 | 763 | 12,820 | 40.0% | 34.4% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 4.9 | 822 | 13,427 | 42.1% | 43.3% | |
| 59.18% | 49 | 6.2 | 813 | 12,873 | 76.2% | 46.4% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 6.2 | 784 | 11,909 | 39.1% | 58.3% | |
| 41.30% | 46 | 6.5 | 809 | 12,543 | 45.5% | 37.5% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 6.0 | 784 | 12,939 | 65.0% | 52.0% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 1.6 | 687 | 13,318 | 44.4% | 60.9% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.4 | 782 | 12,484 | 42.9% | 63.2% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 6.0 | 821 | 12,728 | 40.0% | 52.0% | |
| 40.00% | 40 | 5.2 | 760 | 12,368 | 38.9% | 40.9% | |
| 37.84% | 37 | 5.7 | 896 | 13,270 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.86% | 35 | 6.2 | 796 | 11,833 | 52.6% | 75.0% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 5.7 | 779 | 12,416 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 6.0 | 888 | 11,853 | 52.9% | 29.4% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.0 | 794 | 12,153 | 65.0% | 35.7% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 5.9 | 899 | 12,729 | 28.6% | 57.9% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 1.3 | 687 | 12,673 | 47.6% | 25.0% | |
| 68.75% | 32 | 2.2 | 805 | 13,385 | 61.1% | 78.6% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.3 | 747 | 13,477 | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 6.2 | 953 | 11,905 | 28.6% | 58.8% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 6.1 | 896 | 12,717 | 54.5% | 31.6% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.2 | 837 | 13,142 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.5 | 768 | 13,153 | 58.3% | 37.5% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 5.8 | 850 | 12,556 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.5 | 723 | 12,405 | 70.0% | 43.8% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.1 | 804 | 13,686 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 5.2 | 768 | 13,104 | 46.7% | 30.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 4.8 | 902 | 13,049 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 5.6 | 797 | 13,698 | 44.4% | 71.4% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 2.2 | 764 | 11,177 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 6.0 | 848 | 12,000 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 6.0 | 751 | 11,385 | 61.5% | 37.5% | |
| 55.56% | 19 | 1.5 | 736 | 12,746 | 70.0% | 37.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.5 | 619 | 12,267 | 62.5% | 36.4% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 1.1 | 711 | 12,341 | 70.0% | 44.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.1 | 796 | 14,963 | 80.0% | 35.7% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 4.5 | 836 | 12,633 | 71.4% | 36.4% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.0 | 863 | 12,524 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.0 | 862 | 11,699 | 71.4% | 54.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 2.3 | 811 | 13,396 | 25.0% | 55.6% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.8 | 728 | 14,255 | 37.5% | 44.4% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 2.4 | 756 | 13,541 | 33.3% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.2 | 887 | 13,845 | 37.5% | 62.5% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 1.4 | 777 | 12,638 | 66.7% | 70.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 5.0 | 757 | 10,062 | 44.4% | 85.7% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 3.6 | 729 | 12,761 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 5.7 | 807 | 13,291 | 25.0% | 36.4% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 5.5 | 889 | 12,694 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.4 | 766 | 13,794 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.0 | 941 | 13,453 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.2 | 806 | 15,146 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.9 | 848 | 12,776 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 3.4 | 833 | 14,336 | 80.0% | 85.7% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 1.1 | 715 | 13,290 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 5.7 | 1,021 | 13,156 | 62.5% | 100.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.4 | 621 | 13,238 | 71.4% | 25.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 4.5 | 885 | 13,020 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.4 | 741 | 12,125 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 779 | 12,318 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.0 | 666 | 12,115 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.8 | 777 | 13,143 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.8 | 773 | 13,016 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.4 | 669 | 14,420 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.2 | 848 | 15,879 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 5.8 | 841 | 14,163 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.0 | 747 | 11,873 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.0 | 1,068 | 13,714 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.1 | 829 | 14,035 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.9 | 823 | 12,565 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.6 | 767 | 11,230 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.4 | 688 | 10,252 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.5 | 906 | 12,459 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.4 | 777 | 12,181 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.0 | 661 | 14,149 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.0 | 983 | 15,935 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.4 | 772 | 14,608 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.4 | 838 | 11,078 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 689 | 12,314 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.0 | 770 | 12,706 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.5 | 799 | 12,854 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.9 | 722 | 14,725 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 870 | 9,574 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 626 | 12,753 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.4 | 789 | 16,379 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 880 | 13,728 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 852 | 8,498 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 753 | 11,133 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 833 | 12,555 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 847 | 9,400 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Xin Zhao wins the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 25.0%, a 50.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 12 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Fizz do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Xin Zhao with a 60.0% win rate versus 40.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Xin Zhao takes over the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Xin Zhao scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Xin Zhao wins the matchup against Fizz with a 75.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 50.0 percentage point advantage means Xin Zhao is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 12 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Xin Zhao?
The best Fizz build against Xin Zhao includes Zhonya's Hourglass, Nashor's Tooth, Dusk and Dawn with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Fizz runes against Xin Zhao use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Xin Zhao?
No, Fizz struggles against Xin Zhao with only a 25.0% win rate. Xin Zhao has the advantage in this matchup. Fizz players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Xin Zhao's lead.
How do I play Fizz against Xin Zhao?
When playing Fizz against Xin Zhao, play cautiously and avoid Xin Zhao's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Xin Zhao has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.