Fizzvs Xin Zhao
Fizz vs Xin Zhao is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Fizz wins with a 52.0% win rate (+4.0%) over Xin Zhao based on 75 games. Fizz holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fizz vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Fizz vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 75 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 52.0% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 48.0%, giving Fizz a 4.0 percentage point advantage. Fizz dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Xin Zhao players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Xin Zhao leads by 949 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Xin Zhao's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in farming, damage, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Xin Zhao
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Xin Zhao are Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass and Lich Bane. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 60.0% win rate across 10 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz51.2%
Xin Zhao48.8%Fizz52.9%Xin Zhao47.1%During the early laning phase (first 15 minutes), Fizz has a meaningful 51.2% win rate, outperforming Xin Zhao by 2.4 percentage points. Fizz players should look to press this advantage through aggressive trades, wave priority, and early jungle coordination.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 52.9% win rate — 5.9 points above Xin Zhao. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Fizz holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Xin Zhao players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Fizz Runes Against Xin Zhao
Domination
Precision
Running Domination primary with Precision secondary allows Fizz to press their advantage against Xin Zhao, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.06% | 267 | 5.9 | 844 | 13,120 | 57.7% | 53.5% | |
| 49.06% | 267 | 6.0 | 871 | 12,938 | 55.3% | 45.1% | |
| 46.43% | 252 | 5.9 | 855 | 12,245 | 45.5% | 47.3% | |
| 49.53% | 214 | 5.9 | 828 | 13,002 | 59.5% | 43.1% | |
| 61.05% | 190 | 6.0 | 877 | 12,353 | 68.2% | 54.9% | |
| 49.73% | 183 | 5.8 | 890 | 12,035 | 46.6% | 52.6% | |
| 46.43% | 168 | 5.2 | 773 | 11,953 | 46.9% | 46.0% | |
| 51.22% | 164 | 5.6 | 814 | 13,227 | 49.1% | 52.3% | |
| 58.33% | 156 | 5.6 | 855 | 11,624 | 49.3% | 66.3% | |
| 46.45% | 155 | 6.0 | 735 | 11,718 | 59.7% | 34.9% | |
| 51.30% | 154 | 6.0 | 784 | 12,173 | 50.0% | 52.3% | |
| 47.97% | 148 | 5.8 | 899 | 12,505 | 53.7% | 43.2% | |
| 49.66% | 147 | 5.4 | 844 | 12,108 | 46.4% | 52.6% | |
| 58.99% | 139 | 5.7 | 846 | 12,696 | 62.1% | 56.8% | |
| 61.03% | 136 | 6.1 | 902 | 11,704 | 67.1% | 52.6% | |
| 58.33% | 132 | 5.5 | 865 | 12,707 | 65.4% | 53.8% | |
| 53.17% | 126 | 5.5 | 801 | 12,110 | 51.7% | 54.5% | |
| 38.40% | 125 | 6.1 | 828 | 12,793 | 31.4% | 43.2% | |
| 52.80% | 125 | 6.0 | 811 | 12,435 | 67.9% | 41.7% | |
| 54.78% | 115 | 5.9 | 927 | 12,574 | 61.5% | 49.2% | |
| 54.35% | 92 | 6.2 | 894 | 13,018 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 91 | 6.0 | 859 | 13,421 | 60.0% | 54.9% | |
| 62.92% | 89 | 5.9 | 843 | 13,234 | 66.7% | 61.0% | |
| 54.02% | 87 | 5.7 | 816 | 12,876 | 62.5% | 49.1% | |
| 58.33% | 84 | 6.0 | 882 | 13,344 | 73.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 84 | 5.8 | 791 | 11,786 | 54.5% | 60.0% | |
| 52.00% | 75 | 5.0 | 910 | 11,801 | 51.2% | 52.9% | |
| 60.00% | 75 | 5.9 | 830 | 12,236 | 58.8% | 61.0% | |
| 50.68% | 73 | 5.9 | 843 | 13,107 | 56.3% | 46.3% | |
| 54.79% | 73 | 5.8 | 851 | 12,337 | 60.6% | 50.0% | |
| 62.12% | 66 | 5.9 | 856 | 12,086 | 65.5% | 59.5% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 5.3 | 795 | 12,207 | 44.0% | 55.0% | |
| 48.44% | 64 | 6.0 | 920 | 12,942 | 58.1% | 39.4% | |
| 43.75% | 64 | 6.1 | 820 | 12,561 | 46.4% | 41.7% | |
| 50.79% | 63 | 5.6 | 804 | 12,467 | 54.8% | 46.9% | |
| 55.74% | 61 | 5.9 | 948 | 12,554 | 60.0% | 52.8% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 5.2 | 823 | 11,786 | 48.0% | 51.9% | |
| 68.63% | 51 | 6.2 | 951 | 13,134 | 66.7% | 70.0% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 5.4 | 910 | 12,009 | 52.6% | 40.7% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 6.2 | 841 | 12,508 | 42.1% | 61.5% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 6.0 | 921 | 14,152 | 64.3% | 51.6% | |
| 31.43% | 35 | 1.5 | 664 | 12,569 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 4.5 | 867 | 13,115 | 61.5% | 61.9% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 5.8 | 808 | 12,157 | 41.2% | 47.1% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 5.5 | 867 | 12,995 | 42.9% | 63.2% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 5.2 | 907 | 14,519 | 42.9% | 38.5% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.8 | 875 | 11,913 | 56.3% | 50.0% | |
| 67.74% | 31 | 1.7 | 808 | 15,188 | 64.3% | 70.6% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.9 | 848 | 13,757 | 30.0% | 57.9% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 2.5 | 802 | 12,928 | 41.7% | 47.1% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.4 | 773 | 12,085 | 53.9% | 43.8% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.6 | 914 | 11,863 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.0 | 873 | 12,747 | 46.1% | 46.7% | |
| 28.57% | 28 | 2.0 | 833 | 14,150 | 11.1% | 36.8% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.1 | 716 | 13,625 | 63.6% | 56.3% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 5.6 | 756 | 11,162 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 29.63% | 27 | 1.4 | 721 | 13,059 | 30.0% | 29.4% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 5.7 | 825 | 12,636 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.9 | 675 | 12,352 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.8 | 707 | 11,527 | 58.3% | 41.7% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 5.8 | 778 | 12,093 | 60.0% | 69.2% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.6 | 879 | 13,606 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 1.1 | 577 | 12,757 | 66.7% | 53.9% | |
| 72.73% | 22 | 6.4 | 717 | 11,522 | 84.6% | 55.6% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.4 | 994 | 12,688 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 2.5 | 819 | 13,674 | 60.0% | 30.0% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 5.7 | 951 | 13,101 | 77.8% | 70.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.8 | 737 | 13,386 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.2 | 712 | 11,568 | 22.2% | 77.8% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.4 | 797 | 13,270 | 20.0% | 41.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 3.7 | 754 | 13,106 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.4 | 873 | 13,473 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.5 | 761 | 12,868 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.6 | 922 | 13,719 | 44.4% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 4.3 | 722 | 9,251 | 70.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.7 | 716 | 11,185 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 2.3 | 766 | 12,816 | 66.7% | 77.8% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 4.9 | 876 | 14,217 | 66.7% | 11.1% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 4.7 | 764 | 13,908 | 0.0% | 69.2% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.5 | 694 | 12,814 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.0 | 879 | 12,555 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.0 | 719 | 12,725 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.6 | 714 | 12,889 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.8 | 1,033 | 12,398 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.7 | 716 | 10,614 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 827 | 11,441 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 877 | 10,591 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 1,087 | 14,281 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 634 | 11,554 | 57.1% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 944 | 11,014 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 773 | 14,876 | 60.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 742 | 15,386 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.2 | 782 | 11,808 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.2 | 737 | 10,731 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.9 | 796 | 14,401 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.9 | 665 | 10,983 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.8 | 924 | 14,093 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.2 | 881 | 12,397 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.2 | 732 | 11,634 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.5 | 733 | 13,084 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 894 | 7,377 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 0.9 | 979 | 10,394 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.9 | 674 | 9,836 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 806 | 11,874 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 725 | 13,236 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.2 | 886 | 15,595 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 919 | 14,286 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 812 | 13,965 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.3 | 956 | 12,053 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.1 | 687 | 13,325 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 992 | 11,652 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 782 | 13,096 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.5 | 792 | 12,455 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 742 | 12,139 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 1,060 | 13,734 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 857 | 12,812 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 821 | 14,071 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 826 | 14,757 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 833 | 11,060 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 954 | 12,555 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 998 | 16,217 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 653 | 10,629 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 709 | 8,374 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 917 | 11,819 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 717 | 14,424 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 52.0% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 48.0%, a 4.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 75 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Fizz do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Xin Zhao with a 51.2% win rate versus 48.8%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 52.9% win rate compared to 47.1%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Xin Zhao with a 52.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 4.0 percentage point advantage means Fizz is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 75 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Xin Zhao?
The best Fizz build against Xin Zhao includes Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass, Lich Bane with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 60.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Fizz runes against Xin Zhao use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 46.2% win rate in the Fizz vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Xin Zhao?
Yes, Fizz has a favorable matchup against Xin Zhao with a 52.0% win rate. Fizz has a solid advantage over Xin Zhao in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Fizz against Xin Zhao?
When playing Fizz against Xin Zhao, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.