
Seraphinevs Bard
Seraphine vs Bard is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Bard wins with a 56.9% win rate (+13.7%) over Seraphine based on 211 games. Bard holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Seraphine vs Bard matchup.
Seraphine Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Seraphine performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Seraphine vs Bard Matchup?

Seraphine vs Bard Matchup Summary
The Seraphine vs Bard matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 211 recent matches analyzed, Bard wins with a 56.9% win rate compared to Seraphine's 43.1%, giving Bard a 13.7 percentage point advantage. Bard dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Seraphine players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Bard leads by 0.5s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Bard has a strong advantage in this matchup. Seraphine players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Bard overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Seraphine vs Bard Laning Phase Breakdown
Bard is favored during the laning phase against Seraphine, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Bard holds advantages in gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Seraphine Build Against Bard
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Bard, providing the mobility and stats Seraphine needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Seraphine against Bard are Imperial Mandate, Rylai's Crystal Scepter and Shurelya's Battlesong. This combination gives Seraphine an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Bard. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Seraphine vs Bard matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Bard dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 64.4% win rate — a 28.9 percentage point lead over Seraphine. This lopsided early game means Bard can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
In the late game (25+ minutes), Bard takes over with a 51.2% win rate, leading Seraphine by 2.5 percentage points. Bard scales more effectively into team fights and objective contests.
Bard holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Seraphine players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Seraphine Runes Against Bard
The Sorcery and Inspiration rune setup gives Seraphine the best tools to compete against Bard in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Seraphine matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Seraphine's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.75% | 779 | 1.7 | 466 | 9,359 | 44.9% | 49.5% | |
| 50.91% | 550 | 1.4 | 493 | 9,173 | 58.0% | 45.0% | |
| 49.45% | 548 | 1.4 | 487 | 9,007 | 51.2% | 48.0% | |
| 50.83% | 543 | 1.4 | 487 | 9,197 | 46.8% | 53.9% | |
| 52.69% | 501 | 1.5 | 497 | 9,352 | 48.8% | 55.5% | |
| 50.21% | 478 | 1.8 | 526 | 9,255 | 51.6% | 49.0% | |
| 48.69% | 421 | 1.5 | 470 | 9,012 | 49.2% | 48.3% | |
| 50.00% | 334 | 1.4 | 453 | 9,010 | 50.4% | 49.7% | |
| 50.91% | 330 | 1.9 | 524 | 9,715 | 53.4% | 49.2% | |
| 51.72% | 319 | 1.4 | 469 | 9,560 | 46.7% | 55.4% | |
| 52.44% | 307 | 1.4 | 493 | 8,930 | 52.7% | 52.2% | |
| 53.17% | 284 | 1.7 | 483 | 9,531 | 47.7% | 56.6% | |
| 52.84% | 282 | 1.4 | 487 | 8,901 | 49.2% | 55.8% | |
| 50.78% | 258 | 1.5 | 444 | 9,247 | 50.5% | 51.0% | |
| 47.97% | 246 | 1.5 | 466 | 9,327 | 44.7% | 50.4% | |
| 54.85% | 237 | 1.8 | 584 | 9,764 | 54.8% | 54.9% | |
| 54.85% | 237 | 1.4 | 452 | 8,965 | 51.9% | 57.4% | |
| 53.07% | 228 | 1.5 | 391 | 8,663 | 58.8% | 46.8% | |
| 54.63% | 227 | 1.8 | 498 | 9,664 | 55.6% | 54.0% | |
| 43.13% | 211 | 1.3 | 502 | 8,901 | 35.6% | 48.8% | |
| 52.22% | 203 | 1.4 | 522 | 9,037 | 58.4% | 47.4% | |
| 43.22% | 199 | 1.5 | 498 | 8,961 | 47.1% | 40.4% | |
| 48.44% | 192 | 1.4 | 497 | 9,418 | 51.2% | 46.3% | |
| 53.45% | 174 | 1.8 | 462 | 9,232 | 49.4% | 56.7% | |
| 49.70% | 169 | 1.6 | 614 | 9,703 | 44.4% | 52.2% | |
| 52.26% | 155 | 1.4 | 479 | 9,118 | 56.9% | 48.2% | |
| 57.53% | 146 | 1.4 | 569 | 9,690 | 67.9% | 51.1% | |
| 54.48% | 145 | 4.5 | 662 | 11,521 | 62.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.52% | 139 | 1.4 | 489 | 9,051 | 64.1% | 42.7% | |
| 61.29% | 124 | 1.6 | 481 | 9,075 | 67.7% | 54.8% | |
| 50.00% | 122 | 1.4 | 462 | 8,512 | 50.8% | 49.1% | |
| 50.00% | 120 | 1.4 | 508 | 9,232 | 52.8% | 47.8% | |
| 51.30% | 115 | 1.4 | 463 | 8,905 | 42.2% | 57.1% | |
| 59.13% | 115 | 6.2 | 814 | 12,230 | 54.7% | 62.9% | |
| 53.49% | 86 | 1.5 | 480 | 9,035 | 67.5% | 41.3% | |
| 54.88% | 82 | 5.8 | 677 | 11,898 | 60.0% | 51.9% | |
| 61.25% | 80 | 4.8 | 789 | 12,002 | 75.9% | 52.9% | |
| 56.76% | 74 | 6.8 | 807 | 12,478 | 63.9% | 50.0% | |
| 53.42% | 73 | 2.0 | 510 | 9,991 | 52.0% | 54.2% | |
| 56.16% | 73 | 1.5 | 514 | 9,449 | 56.8% | 55.6% | |
| 46.88% | 64 | 1.5 | 467 | 9,510 | 52.0% | 43.6% | |
| 43.33% | 60 | 1.6 | 557 | 9,121 | 60.7% | 28.1% | |
| 48.33% | 60 | 2.1 | 440 | 8,595 | 48.3% | 48.4% | |
| 54.24% | 59 | 6.2 | 831 | 12,840 | 42.1% | 60.0% | |
| 54.24% | 59 | 3.3 | 592 | 10,058 | 60.9% | 50.0% | |
| 60.34% | 58 | 5.3 | 751 | 11,906 | 51.9% | 67.7% | |
| 63.16% | 57 | 2.0 | 567 | 10,732 | 79.0% | 55.3% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 1.7 | 575 | 9,420 | 52.0% | 37.0% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 2.0 | 462 | 9,108 | 47.6% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 2.2 | 608 | 10,026 | 52.6% | 47.6% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 6.3 | 891 | 12,395 | 62.5% | 52.4% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 2.5 | 515 | 9,087 | 30.8% | 52.2% | |
| 60.61% | 33 | 4.2 | 598 | 11,534 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 5.3 | 666 | 11,600 | 61.5% | 45.0% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 6.2 | 813 | 10,735 | 42.1% | 42.9% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 6.8 | 787 | 11,426 | 58.8% | 43.8% | |
| 65.63% | 32 | 1.6 | 474 | 9,163 | 73.3% | 58.8% | |
| 65.63% | 32 | 4.1 | 681 | 10,156 | 66.7% | 64.7% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 1.6 | 485 | 9,799 | 66.7% | 52.6% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 6.6 | 733 | 10,933 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 1.4 | 501 | 9,366 | 30.8% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 5.1 | 677 | 10,722 | 63.6% | 31.3% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 1.6 | 498 | 10,328 | 62.5% | 63.2% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 4.2 | 624 | 9,656 | 45.5% | 61.5% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.4 | 567 | 9,749 | 40.0% | 58.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 3.0 | 490 | 9,418 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 2.2 | 508 | 11,567 | 60.0% | 64.7% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 6.5 | 801 | 13,556 | 33.3% | 41.2% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.7 | 792 | 12,479 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 462 | 9,458 | 57.1% | 53.9% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 714 | 11,072 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 645 | 10,698 | 87.5% | 58.3% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 1.4 | 434 | 10,160 | 60.0% | 64.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 5.6 | 703 | 8,059 | 64.3% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.2 | 865 | 12,026 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 1.2 | 446 | 10,237 | 75.0% | 23.1% | |
| 75.00% | 16 | 6.7 | 918 | 13,627 | 71.4% | 77.8% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 479 | 8,928 | 40.0% | 36.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.7 | 761 | 12,988 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 5.3 | 597 | 10,546 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.6 | 463 | 10,507 | 75.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 3.2 | 647 | 10,328 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.6 | 551 | 9,742 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 4.8 | 584 | 9,774 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.3 | 921 | 12,200 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 4.1 | 603 | 9,877 | 33.3% | 28.6% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 3.1 | 594 | 9,468 | 42.9% | 83.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.7 | 825 | 9,196 | 70.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.3 | 666 | 9,424 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.0 | 764 | 11,191 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.1 | 758 | 11,907 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 4.5 | 549 | 9,363 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.2 | 660 | 11,060 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 803 | 11,242 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 477 | 7,161 | 87.5% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.5 | 521 | 10,244 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.8 | 423 | 8,693 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.2 | 930 | 11,957 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.6 | 623 | 9,742 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.5 | 395 | 8,010 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.3 | 467 | 9,596 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 670 | 10,068 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.4 | 577 | 9,673 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.4 | 570 | 11,774 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.4 | 707 | 11,288 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.1 | 463 | 8,690 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 987 | 13,253 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.6 | 487 | 10,735 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.4 | 537 | 8,417 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.9 | 492 | 10,031 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.1 | 635 | 10,657 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.4 | 739 | 12,184 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 3.1 | 595 | 7,466 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.0 | 520 | 8,011 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.3 | 822 | 10,976 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 2.3 | 548 | 9,903 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.2 | 474 | 10,918 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.6 | 382 | 9,863 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 570 | 11,549 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 496 | 10,447 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 565 | 10,300 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 646 | 9,774 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 646 | 10,549 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 499 | 10,155 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Seraphine vs Bard - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Seraphine do against Bard in League of Legends?
Bard wins the Seraphine vs Bard matchup with a 56.9% win rate compared to Seraphine's 43.1%, a 13.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 211 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Seraphine do against Bard in the early game?
In the early game, Bard has the advantage against Seraphine with a 64.4% win rate versus 35.6%. Bard players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Seraphine do against Bard in the late game?
In the late game, Bard takes over the Seraphine vs Bard matchup with a 51.2% win rate compared to 48.8%. Bard scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Seraphine vs Bard matchup?
Bard wins the matchup against Seraphine with a 56.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 13.7 percentage point advantage means Bard is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 211 games analyzed.
What is the best Seraphine build against Bard?
The best Seraphine build against Bard includes Imperial Mandate, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, Shurelya's Battlesong with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Seraphine runes against Bard?
The best Seraphine runes against Bard use the Sorcery primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 42.1% win rate in the Seraphine vs Bard matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Seraphine counter Bard?
No, Seraphine struggles against Bard with only a 43.1% win rate. Bard has the advantage in this matchup. Seraphine players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Bard's lead.
How do I play Seraphine against Bard?
When playing Seraphine against Bard, play cautiously and avoid Bard's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Bard has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
