Seraphinevs Malzahar
Seraphine vs Malzahar is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Seraphine wins with a 65.6% win rate (+31.2%) over Malzahar based on 32 games. Seraphine holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Seraphine vs Malzahar matchup.
Seraphine Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Seraphine performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Seraphine vs Malzahar Matchup?
Seraphine vs Malzahar Matchup Summary
The Seraphine vs Malzahar matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 32 recent matches analyzed, Seraphine wins with a 65.6% win rate compared to Malzahar's 34.4%, giving Seraphine a 31.2 percentage point advantage. Seraphine dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Malzahar players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Malzahar leads by 0.6s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Seraphine players can confidently pick into Malzahar and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Malzahar away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Seraphine vs Malzahar Laning Phase Breakdown
Malzahar is favored during the laning phase against Seraphine, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Malzahar holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Seraphine Build Against Malzahar
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Malzahar, providing the mobility and stats Seraphine needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Seraphine against Malzahar are Echoes of Helia, Moonstone Renewer and Diadem of Songs. This combination gives Seraphine an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Malzahar. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Seraphine vs Malzahar matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Seraphine66.7%
Malzahar33.3%Seraphine64.7%Malzahar35.3%Seraphine dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Malzahar. This lopsided early game means Seraphine can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Seraphine is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 64.7% win rate — 29.4 points above Malzahar. Extended games heavily favor Seraphine, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Seraphine holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Malzahar players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Seraphine Runes Against Malzahar
Sorcery
Precision
Running Sorcery primary with Precision secondary allows Seraphine to press their advantage against Malzahar, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Seraphine matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Seraphine's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.75% | 779 | 1.7 | 466 | 9,359 | 44.9% | 49.5% | |
| 50.91% | 550 | 1.4 | 493 | 9,173 | 58.0% | 45.0% | |
| 49.45% | 548 | 1.4 | 487 | 9,007 | 51.2% | 48.0% | |
| 50.83% | 543 | 1.4 | 487 | 9,197 | 46.8% | 53.9% | |
| 52.69% | 501 | 1.5 | 497 | 9,352 | 48.8% | 55.5% | |
| 50.21% | 478 | 1.8 | 526 | 9,255 | 51.6% | 49.0% | |
| 48.69% | 421 | 1.5 | 470 | 9,012 | 49.2% | 48.3% | |
| 50.00% | 334 | 1.4 | 453 | 9,010 | 50.4% | 49.7% | |
| 50.91% | 330 | 1.9 | 524 | 9,715 | 53.4% | 49.2% | |
| 51.72% | 319 | 1.4 | 469 | 9,560 | 46.7% | 55.4% | |
| 52.44% | 307 | 1.4 | 493 | 8,930 | 52.7% | 52.2% | |
| 53.17% | 284 | 1.7 | 483 | 9,531 | 47.7% | 56.6% | |
| 52.84% | 282 | 1.4 | 487 | 8,901 | 49.2% | 55.8% | |
| 50.78% | 258 | 1.5 | 444 | 9,247 | 50.5% | 51.0% | |
| 47.97% | 246 | 1.5 | 466 | 9,327 | 44.7% | 50.4% | |
| 54.85% | 237 | 1.8 | 584 | 9,764 | 54.8% | 54.9% | |
| 54.85% | 237 | 1.4 | 452 | 8,965 | 51.9% | 57.4% | |
| 53.07% | 228 | 1.5 | 391 | 8,663 | 58.8% | 46.8% | |
| 54.63% | 227 | 1.8 | 498 | 9,664 | 55.6% | 54.0% | |
| 43.13% | 211 | 1.3 | 502 | 8,901 | 35.6% | 48.8% | |
| 52.22% | 203 | 1.4 | 522 | 9,037 | 58.4% | 47.4% | |
| 43.22% | 199 | 1.5 | 498 | 8,961 | 47.1% | 40.4% | |
| 48.44% | 192 | 1.4 | 497 | 9,418 | 51.2% | 46.3% | |
| 53.45% | 174 | 1.8 | 462 | 9,232 | 49.4% | 56.7% | |
| 49.70% | 169 | 1.6 | 614 | 9,703 | 44.4% | 52.2% | |
| 52.26% | 155 | 1.4 | 479 | 9,118 | 56.9% | 48.2% | |
| 57.53% | 146 | 1.4 | 569 | 9,690 | 67.9% | 51.1% | |
| 54.48% | 145 | 4.5 | 662 | 11,521 | 62.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.52% | 139 | 1.4 | 489 | 9,051 | 64.1% | 42.7% | |
| 61.29% | 124 | 1.6 | 481 | 9,075 | 67.7% | 54.8% | |
| 50.00% | 122 | 1.4 | 462 | 8,512 | 50.8% | 49.1% | |
| 50.00% | 120 | 1.4 | 508 | 9,232 | 52.8% | 47.8% | |
| 51.30% | 115 | 1.4 | 463 | 8,905 | 42.2% | 57.1% | |
| 59.13% | 115 | 6.2 | 814 | 12,230 | 54.7% | 62.9% | |
| 53.49% | 86 | 1.5 | 480 | 9,035 | 67.5% | 41.3% | |
| 54.88% | 82 | 5.8 | 677 | 11,898 | 60.0% | 51.9% | |
| 61.25% | 80 | 4.8 | 789 | 12,002 | 75.9% | 52.9% | |
| 56.76% | 74 | 6.8 | 807 | 12,478 | 63.9% | 50.0% | |
| 53.42% | 73 | 2.0 | 510 | 9,991 | 52.0% | 54.2% | |
| 56.16% | 73 | 1.5 | 514 | 9,449 | 56.8% | 55.6% | |
| 46.88% | 64 | 1.5 | 467 | 9,510 | 52.0% | 43.6% | |
| 43.33% | 60 | 1.6 | 557 | 9,121 | 60.7% | 28.1% | |
| 48.33% | 60 | 2.1 | 440 | 8,595 | 48.3% | 48.4% | |
| 54.24% | 59 | 6.2 | 831 | 12,840 | 42.1% | 60.0% | |
| 54.24% | 59 | 3.3 | 592 | 10,058 | 60.9% | 50.0% | |
| 60.34% | 58 | 5.3 | 751 | 11,906 | 51.9% | 67.7% | |
| 63.16% | 57 | 2.0 | 567 | 10,732 | 79.0% | 55.3% | |
| 44.23% | 52 | 1.7 | 575 | 9,420 | 52.0% | 37.0% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 2.0 | 462 | 9,108 | 47.6% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 2.2 | 608 | 10,026 | 52.6% | 47.6% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 6.3 | 891 | 12,395 | 62.5% | 52.4% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 2.5 | 515 | 9,087 | 30.8% | 52.2% | |
| 60.61% | 33 | 4.2 | 598 | 11,534 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 5.3 | 666 | 11,600 | 61.5% | 45.0% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 6.2 | 813 | 10,735 | 42.1% | 42.9% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 6.8 | 787 | 11,426 | 58.8% | 43.8% | |
| 65.63% | 32 | 1.6 | 474 | 9,163 | 73.3% | 58.8% | |
| 65.63% | 32 | 4.1 | 681 | 10,156 | 66.7% | 64.7% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 1.6 | 485 | 9,799 | 66.7% | 52.6% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 6.6 | 733 | 10,933 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 1.4 | 501 | 9,366 | 30.8% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 5.1 | 677 | 10,722 | 63.6% | 31.3% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 1.6 | 498 | 10,328 | 62.5% | 63.2% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 4.2 | 624 | 9,656 | 45.5% | 61.5% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.4 | 567 | 9,749 | 40.0% | 58.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 3.0 | 490 | 9,418 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 2.2 | 508 | 11,567 | 60.0% | 64.7% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 6.5 | 801 | 13,556 | 33.3% | 41.2% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.7 | 792 | 12,479 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 462 | 9,458 | 57.1% | 53.9% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 714 | 11,072 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 645 | 10,698 | 87.5% | 58.3% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 1.4 | 434 | 10,160 | 60.0% | 64.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 5.6 | 703 | 8,059 | 64.3% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.2 | 865 | 12,026 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 1.2 | 446 | 10,237 | 75.0% | 23.1% | |
| 75.00% | 16 | 6.7 | 918 | 13,627 | 71.4% | 77.8% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 479 | 8,928 | 40.0% | 36.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.7 | 761 | 12,988 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 5.3 | 597 | 10,546 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.6 | 463 | 10,507 | 75.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 3.2 | 647 | 10,328 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.6 | 551 | 9,742 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 4.8 | 584 | 9,774 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.3 | 921 | 12,200 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 4.1 | 603 | 9,877 | 33.3% | 28.6% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 3.1 | 594 | 9,468 | 42.9% | 83.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.7 | 825 | 9,196 | 70.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.3 | 666 | 9,424 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.0 | 764 | 11,191 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.1 | 758 | 11,907 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 4.5 | 549 | 9,363 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.2 | 660 | 11,060 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 803 | 11,242 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 477 | 7,161 | 87.5% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.5 | 521 | 10,244 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.8 | 423 | 8,693 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.2 | 930 | 11,957 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.6 | 623 | 9,742 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.5 | 395 | 8,010 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.3 | 467 | 9,596 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 670 | 10,068 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.4 | 577 | 9,673 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.4 | 570 | 11,774 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.4 | 707 | 11,288 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.1 | 463 | 8,690 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 987 | 13,253 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.6 | 487 | 10,735 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.4 | 537 | 8,417 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.9 | 492 | 10,031 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.1 | 635 | 10,657 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.4 | 739 | 12,184 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 3.1 | 595 | 7,466 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.0 | 520 | 8,011 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.3 | 822 | 10,976 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 2.3 | 548 | 9,903 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.2 | 474 | 10,918 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.6 | 382 | 9,863 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 570 | 11,549 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 496 | 10,447 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 565 | 10,300 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 646 | 9,774 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 646 | 10,549 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 499 | 10,155 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Seraphine vs Malzahar - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Seraphine do against Malzahar in League of Legends?
Seraphine wins the Seraphine vs Malzahar matchup with a 65.6% win rate compared to Malzahar's 34.4%, a 31.2 percentage point difference. This data is based on 32 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Seraphine do against Malzahar in the early game?
In the early game, Seraphine has the advantage against Malzahar with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Seraphine players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Seraphine do against Malzahar in the late game?
In the late game, Seraphine takes over the Seraphine vs Malzahar matchup with a 64.7% win rate compared to 35.3%. Seraphine scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Seraphine vs Malzahar matchup?
Seraphine wins the matchup against Malzahar with a 65.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 31.2 percentage point advantage means Seraphine is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 32 games analyzed.
What is the best Seraphine build against Malzahar?
The best Seraphine build against Malzahar includes Echoes of Helia, Moonstone Renewer, Diadem of Songs with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Seraphine runes against Malzahar?
The best Seraphine runes against Malzahar use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Seraphine vs Malzahar matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Seraphine counter Malzahar?
Yes, Seraphine has a favorable matchup against Malzahar with a 65.6% win rate. Seraphine strongly counters Malzahar in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Seraphine against Malzahar?
When playing Seraphine against Malzahar, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.