Seraphinevs Samira
Seraphine vs Samira is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Seraphine wins with a 50.0% win rate (+0.0%) over Samira based on 36 games. Seraphine wins the early laning phase while Samira scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Seraphine vs Samira matchup.
Seraphine Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Seraphine performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Seraphine vs Samira Matchup?
Seraphine vs Samira Matchup Summary
The Seraphine vs Samira matchup is essentially a coin-flip matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 36 recent matches analyzed, Seraphine wins with a 50.0% win rate compared to Samira's 50.0%, giving Seraphine a 0.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Seraphine controls the early laning stage, but Samira outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Seraphine needs to press advantages before Samira reaches their power spikes, while Samira should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Seraphine leads by 1.2s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Seraphine has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Samira's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Seraphine vs Samira Laning Phase Breakdown
Samira is favored during the laning phase against Seraphine, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Samira holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Seraphine56.3%
Samira43.8%Seraphine45.0%Samira55.0%Seraphine dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 56.3% win rate — a 12.5 percentage point lead over Samira. This lopsided early game means Seraphine can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Samira is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 55.0% win rate — 10.0 points above Seraphine. Extended games heavily favor Samira, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Seraphine must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Samira reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Samira survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Seraphine Runes Against Samira
Sorcery
Precision
The Sorcery primary with Precision secondary combination helps Seraphine maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Samira.
Seraphine matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Seraphine's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.16% | 711 | 1.7 | 481 | 9,367 | 51.5% | 54.1% | |
| 51.75% | 429 | 1.5 | 510 | 8,833 | 57.1% | 48.3% | |
| 54.52% | 398 | 1.5 | 503 | 9,133 | 50.3% | 57.6% | |
| 48.02% | 379 | 1.4 | 483 | 8,495 | 49.1% | 47.1% | |
| 51.34% | 372 | 1.6 | 494 | 8,760 | 49.7% | 52.5% | |
| 45.48% | 354 | 1.5 | 520 | 9,365 | 53.0% | 40.9% | |
| 51.52% | 330 | 1.9 | 532 | 9,620 | 49.6% | 52.7% | |
| 50.55% | 273 | 1.5 | 491 | 9,352 | 46.5% | 52.9% | |
| 47.43% | 253 | 1.4 | 438 | 8,724 | 53.5% | 43.5% | |
| 51.25% | 240 | 1.5 | 514 | 8,992 | 59.8% | 44.9% | |
| 51.27% | 236 | 1.4 | 473 | 9,166 | 55.6% | 48.6% | |
| 52.99% | 234 | 1.8 | 583 | 9,269 | 44.9% | 58.8% | |
| 46.78% | 233 | 1.5 | 505 | 8,552 | 44.9% | 48.4% | |
| 56.71% | 231 | 2.3 | 516 | 9,486 | 57.0% | 56.6% | |
| 52.38% | 210 | 1.4 | 474 | 8,933 | 57.8% | 48.8% | |
| 51.91% | 183 | 1.4 | 485 | 8,324 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 55.87% | 179 | 1.5 | 395 | 8,910 | 64.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.07% | 179 | 5.3 | 741 | 11,324 | 50.0% | 54.8% | |
| 50.85% | 177 | 1.8 | 519 | 9,281 | 53.6% | 49.1% | |
| 56.02% | 166 | 1.5 | 509 | 9,267 | 54.0% | 57.6% | |
| 52.47% | 162 | 5.9 | 767 | 11,103 | 65.7% | 43.2% | |
| 51.59% | 157 | 1.6 | 475 | 9,652 | 61.7% | 47.3% | |
| 46.45% | 155 | 1.6 | 628 | 8,488 | 48.0% | 45.1% | |
| 48.37% | 153 | 1.6 | 474 | 9,703 | 51.2% | 47.3% | |
| 50.66% | 152 | 1.5 | 525 | 9,122 | 59.6% | 45.3% | |
| 54.86% | 144 | 1.4 | 490 | 9,332 | 53.6% | 55.7% | |
| 49.28% | 138 | 1.9 | 497 | 9,057 | 44.2% | 52.3% | |
| 55.38% | 130 | 1.4 | 494 | 8,785 | 50.0% | 58.8% | |
| 58.97% | 117 | 1.4 | 490 | 8,676 | 64.0% | 55.2% | |
| 55.65% | 115 | 1.4 | 537 | 9,048 | 52.2% | 58.0% | |
| 59.29% | 113 | 1.4 | 503 | 8,432 | 50.0% | 66.2% | |
| 52.43% | 103 | 1.4 | 509 | 9,357 | 60.0% | 47.6% | |
| 53.92% | 102 | 4.1 | 664 | 10,306 | 53.9% | 54.0% | |
| 54.55% | 99 | 5.9 | 776 | 10,626 | 46.1% | 63.8% | |
| 58.06% | 93 | 1.6 | 499 | 9,185 | 54.3% | 60.3% | |
| 57.30% | 89 | 1.4 | 491 | 8,643 | 61.4% | 53.3% | |
| 63.86% | 83 | 6.0 | 843 | 11,788 | 48.6% | 75.0% | |
| 53.25% | 77 | 5.7 | 739 | 10,901 | 55.9% | 51.2% | |
| 45.21% | 73 | 1.9 | 453 | 9,311 | 52.2% | 42.0% | |
| 36.11% | 72 | 1.5 | 498 | 8,981 | 33.3% | 38.1% | |
| 57.14% | 70 | 1.4 | 517 | 9,166 | 55.6% | 58.1% | |
| 61.54% | 65 | 6.0 | 780 | 11,063 | 69.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 3.8 | 663 | 9,747 | 68.2% | 40.5% | |
| 61.90% | 63 | 4.8 | 689 | 10,474 | 63.0% | 61.1% | |
| 47.54% | 61 | 2.7 | 616 | 10,421 | 27.3% | 59.0% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 6.0 | 785 | 11,471 | 45.8% | 50.0% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 6.1 | 816 | 12,187 | 57.1% | 61.3% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 1.4 | 560 | 8,846 | 60.9% | 48.1% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 1.8 | 494 | 9,589 | 42.9% | 53.9% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 1.5 | 433 | 9,572 | 46.1% | 42.4% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 5.3 | 720 | 12,609 | 25.0% | 64.9% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 6.3 | 677 | 11,997 | 35.3% | 66.7% | |
| 61.36% | 44 | 1.5 | 525 | 8,987 | 50.0% | 67.9% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 2.5 | 487 | 8,581 | 55.6% | 58.3% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 2.1 | 574 | 9,534 | 75.0% | 52.0% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 6.4 | 833 | 12,184 | 66.7% | 43.5% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 1.5 | 486 | 9,065 | 52.9% | 56.5% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 5.9 | 764 | 11,051 | 56.3% | 45.0% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 6.1 | 836 | 11,750 | 42.9% | 55.0% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 1.5 | 396 | 8,959 | 46.1% | 30.0% | |
| 66.67% | 33 | 5.3 | 648 | 11,491 | 90.9% | 54.5% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 6.1 | 838 | 10,191 | 70.6% | 35.7% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.5 | 805 | 12,368 | 36.4% | 64.7% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.2 | 801 | 12,689 | 40.0% | 44.4% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 5.3 | 629 | 11,185 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 2.3 | 678 | 9,318 | 44.4% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 1.3 | 441 | 8,169 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 30.43% | 23 | 4.1 | 622 | 9,771 | 36.4% | 25.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 5.5 | 769 | 11,545 | 55.6% | 53.9% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.4 | 624 | 10,764 | 55.6% | 72.7% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.7 | 529 | 8,468 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 3.9 | 598 | 9,822 | 85.7% | 66.7% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 1.6 | 552 | 10,138 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 3.2 | 589 | 10,240 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 3.7 | 551 | 9,690 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 5.8 | 731 | 11,383 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 4.7 | 715 | 10,510 | 42.9% | 22.2% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.4 | 772 | 10,436 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 4.4 | 495 | 9,892 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.8 | 781 | 13,250 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 2.7 | 488 | 9,771 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.2 | 641 | 8,957 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 4.3 | 566 | 10,349 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.5 | 728 | 8,314 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 3.1 | 529 | 9,020 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.3 | 645 | 9,246 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.0 | 578 | 10,201 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 7.0 | 832 | 13,374 | 80.0% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.1 | 532 | 10,545 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.1 | 341 | 7,539 | 71.4% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.9 | 685 | 9,294 | 62.5% | 0.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.6 | 459 | 7,067 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.4 | 604 | 10,174 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.9 | 632 | 9,442 | 28.6% | 75.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.3 | 784 | 13,529 | 75.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 829 | 12,078 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 4.2 | 612 | 8,413 | 57.1% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 951 | 11,600 | 100.0% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 515 | 9,324 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.6 | 666 | 11,017 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.1 | 673 | 10,884 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.3 | 749 | 11,248 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.1 | 705 | 11,069 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 475 | 10,682 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.9 | 566 | 7,685 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 958 | 11,977 | 66.7% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.0 | 502 | 10,972 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 1.9 | 586 | 10,112 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 2.5 | 660 | 9,161 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.5 | 466 | 7,900 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 697 | 10,723 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.8 | 555 | 10,279 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.0 | 714 | 11,497 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.9 | 626 | 11,099 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 605 | 6,626 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.2 | 637 | 11,147 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 538 | 9,829 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 723 | 12,208 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 326 | 10,515 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 513 | 8,257 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Seraphine vs Samira - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Seraphine do against Samira in League of Legends?
Seraphine wins the Seraphine vs Samira matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to Samira's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 36 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Seraphine do against Samira in the early game?
In the early game, Seraphine has the advantage against Samira with a 56.3% win rate versus 43.8%. Seraphine players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Seraphine do against Samira in the late game?
In the late game, Samira takes over the Seraphine vs Samira matchup with a 55.0% win rate compared to 45.0%. Samira scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Seraphine vs Samira matchup?
Seraphine wins the matchup against Samira with a 50.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 0.0 percentage point advantage means Seraphine is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 36 games analyzed.
What is the best Seraphine build against Samira?
The best Seraphine build against Samira includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Seraphine runes against Samira?
The best Seraphine runes against Samira use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 40.0% win rate in the Seraphine vs Samira matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Seraphine counter Samira?
Yes, Seraphine has a favorable matchup against Samira with a 50.0% win rate. Seraphine slightly edges out Samira in lane based on current patch 26.14 data.
How do I play Seraphine against Samira?
When playing Seraphine against Samira, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.