Seraphinevs Gragas
Seraphine vs Gragas is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Gragas wins with a 58.3% win rate (+16.7%) over Seraphine based on 12 games. Seraphine wins the early laning phase while Gragas scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Seraphine vs Gragas matchup.
Seraphine Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Seraphine performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Gragas(41.7%)Who Wins the Seraphine vs Gragas Matchup?
Seraphine vs Gragas Matchup Summary
The Seraphine vs Gragas matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 12 recent matches analyzed, Gragas wins with a 58.3% win rate compared to Seraphine's 41.7%, giving Gragas a 16.7 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Seraphine controls the early laning stage, but Gragas outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Seraphine needs to press advantages before Gragas reaches their power spikes, while Gragas should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Gragas leads by 356 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Gragas has a strong advantage in this matchup. Seraphine players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Gragas overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Seraphine vs Gragas Laning Phase Breakdown
Seraphine is favored during the laning phase against Gragas, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Seraphine holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Seraphine Build Against Gragas
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Gragas, providing the mobility and stats Seraphine needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Seraphine against Gragas are Luden's Echo, Liandry's Torment and Morellonomicon. This combination gives Seraphine an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Seraphine vs Gragas matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Seraphine66.7%Gragas33.3%Seraphine16.7%Gragas83.3%Seraphine dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Gragas. This lopsided early game means Seraphine can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Gragas is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 83.3% win rate — 66.7 points above Seraphine. Extended games heavily favor Gragas, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Seraphine must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Gragas reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Gragas survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Seraphine Runes Against Gragas
Sorcery
Inspiration
The Sorcery and Inspiration rune setup gives Seraphine the best tools to compete against Gragas in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Seraphine matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Seraphine's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.39% | 768 | 1.6 | 457 | 9,374 | 48.4% | 56.7% | |
| 49.68% | 622 | 1.4 | 466 | 8,929 | 47.3% | 51.6% | |
| 55.05% | 574 | 1.4 | 481 | 9,081 | 56.8% | 53.7% | |
| 50.80% | 502 | 1.6 | 509 | 9,150 | 57.4% | 46.0% | |
| 60.54% | 441 | 1.4 | 492 | 8,834 | 63.5% | 57.7% | |
| 50.81% | 431 | 1.5 | 434 | 8,735 | 51.5% | 50.2% | |
| 49.63% | 409 | 1.7 | 510 | 9,355 | 44.4% | 53.3% | |
| 54.75% | 358 | 1.4 | 466 | 8,392 | 62.1% | 47.8% | |
| 50.14% | 355 | 1.4 | 499 | 8,898 | 52.0% | 48.8% | |
| 48.01% | 352 | 1.4 | 499 | 8,801 | 49.7% | 46.4% | |
| 53.96% | 328 | 1.4 | 479 | 9,358 | 50.4% | 56.5% | |
| 50.47% | 321 | 1.4 | 442 | 8,997 | 55.6% | 47.2% | |
| 57.42% | 310 | 1.4 | 499 | 9,615 | 57.3% | 57.6% | |
| 51.99% | 277 | 1.5 | 476 | 9,576 | 52.6% | 51.7% | |
| 47.65% | 277 | 1.4 | 433 | 8,685 | 45.8% | 49.3% | |
| 50.38% | 262 | 1.5 | 437 | 9,491 | 39.4% | 57.1% | |
| 54.84% | 248 | 1.3 | 449 | 8,538 | 55.4% | 54.3% | |
| 51.42% | 247 | 1.6 | 560 | 9,286 | 47.5% | 54.1% | |
| 56.97% | 244 | 1.5 | 383 | 8,407 | 59.4% | 54.3% | |
| 48.20% | 222 | 1.4 | 487 | 9,161 | 51.6% | 45.7% | |
| 56.13% | 212 | 1.4 | 565 | 9,181 | 55.4% | 56.7% | |
| 51.72% | 203 | 1.7 | 461 | 9,516 | 57.9% | 48.0% | |
| 55.45% | 202 | 1.4 | 500 | 9,204 | 57.0% | 54.3% | |
| 47.69% | 195 | 1.4 | 463 | 8,877 | 55.2% | 41.7% | |
| 60.62% | 193 | 1.8 | 462 | 9,461 | 47.9% | 68.0% | |
| 60.13% | 158 | 1.4 | 472 | 9,020 | 58.9% | 61.2% | |
| 51.70% | 147 | 1.3 | 453 | 9,058 | 43.8% | 57.8% | |
| 51.75% | 143 | 4.4 | 679 | 11,341 | 55.9% | 48.8% | |
| 53.90% | 141 | 1.4 | 468 | 8,767 | 55.2% | 52.7% | |
| 51.11% | 135 | 1.4 | 447 | 8,919 | 55.6% | 47.2% | |
| 52.63% | 133 | 1.3 | 526 | 9,043 | 52.4% | 52.9% | |
| 45.08% | 122 | 1.4 | 523 | 8,933 | 45.3% | 44.9% | |
| 47.27% | 110 | 6.4 | 831 | 12,817 | 57.1% | 41.2% | |
| 53.85% | 104 | 1.4 | 448 | 8,348 | 64.8% | 42.0% | |
| 61.36% | 88 | 1.5 | 461 | 9,683 | 68.4% | 56.0% | |
| 56.98% | 86 | 6.2 | 779 | 11,962 | 60.0% | 54.9% | |
| 52.63% | 76 | 1.7 | 492 | 9,597 | 63.3% | 45.6% | |
| 44.29% | 70 | 3.9 | 671 | 10,949 | 52.9% | 36.1% | |
| 51.47% | 68 | 1.4 | 450 | 8,587 | 42.4% | 60.0% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 1.6 | 560 | 9,771 | 62.5% | 47.6% | |
| 66.67% | 63 | 5.7 | 719 | 12,473 | 70.8% | 64.1% | |
| 52.46% | 61 | 3.1 | 625 | 9,750 | 60.9% | 47.4% | |
| 59.65% | 57 | 1.4 | 531 | 9,546 | 64.0% | 56.3% | |
| 63.16% | 57 | 1.4 | 449 | 8,674 | 64.3% | 62.1% | |
| 39.62% | 53 | 6.0 | 736 | 11,675 | 36.4% | 41.9% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.9 | 566 | 9,520 | 52.6% | 53.3% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 2.1 | 515 | 9,997 | 36.4% | 58.3% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 6.0 | 779 | 12,555 | 44.4% | 46.4% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 1.9 | 463 | 8,592 | 62.5% | 52.4% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 1.5 | 488 | 9,433 | 46.7% | 48.0% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 2.9 | 555 | 9,885 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 61.11% | 36 | 4.6 | 583 | 8,897 | 80.0% | 37.5% | |
| 40.00% | 35 | 4.3 | 566 | 9,545 | 41.2% | 38.9% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 1.2 | 422 | 9,027 | 27.3% | 50.0% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 4.0 | 685 | 10,822 | 53.3% | 57.1% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 1.4 | 522 | 9,380 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 2.0 | 500 | 9,998 | 60.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 1.7 | 456 | 9,616 | 41.7% | 57.1% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 2.5 | 503 | 9,502 | 63.6% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 1.8 | 572 | 10,359 | 28.6% | 44.4% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 872 | 12,281 | 57.1% | 38.9% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 1.6 | 467 | 9,584 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 6.5 | 805 | 12,368 | 63.6% | 58.3% | |
| 30.43% | 23 | 5.7 | 595 | 8,477 | 33.3% | 27.3% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 1.5 | 449 | 10,091 | 37.5% | 53.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 5.7 | 785 | 12,458 | 66.7% | 53.9% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 5.5 | 746 | 12,124 | 66.7% | 41.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.7 | 524 | 10,143 | 42.9% | 64.3% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 4.8 | 771 | 10,515 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.6 | 849 | 13,653 | 42.9% | 61.5% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.2 | 573 | 9,056 | 57.1% | 61.5% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.4 | 532 | 8,676 | 40.0% | 44.4% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 3.0 | 513 | 9,218 | 55.6% | 60.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.2 | 735 | 11,336 | 40.0% | 44.4% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.6 | 877 | 12,793 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 3.2 | 699 | 11,626 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 7.1 | 926 | 12,958 | 45.5% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 4.0 | 669 | 11,606 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.9 | 624 | 9,646 | 37.5% | 83.3% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.2 | 400 | 6,396 | 41.7% | 0.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.1 | 602 | 12,266 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.6 | 685 | 10,791 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.0 | 754 | 10,759 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 5.8 | 835 | 12,135 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 84.62% | 13 | 5.5 | 663 | 11,417 | 75.0% | 88.9% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.9 | 510 | 9,742 | 20.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 3.2 | 653 | 9,524 | 20.0% | 71.4% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 7.0 | 767 | 14,565 | 100.0% | 70.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.2 | 702 | 12,561 | 25.0% | 62.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.4 | 580 | 9,298 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.1 | 513 | 9,068 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.2 | 489 | 10,288 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.4 | 519 | 8,947 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.0 | 697 | 9,411 | 80.0% | 57.1% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.2 | 427 | 8,244 | 28.6% | 25.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.2 | 526 | 9,334 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.8 | 516 | 10,490 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.9 | 683 | 10,226 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 540 | 8,924 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 768 | 10,348 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 835 | 11,479 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.2 | 713 | 10,584 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.7 | 737 | 12,027 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.1 | 632 | 10,313 | 25.0% | 80.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.0 | 559 | 9,525 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.8 | 661 | 10,860 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.2 | 689 | 10,420 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.4 | 945 | 14,676 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.4 | 414 | 9,491 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 836 | 10,900 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 2.3 | 449 | 9,035 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.0 | 703 | 9,385 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.2 | 508 | 10,147 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.7 | 502 | 8,223 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.4 | 737 | 9,748 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.3 | 497 | 10,017 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.9 | 577 | 9,736 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.9 | 718 | 12,364 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.2 | 939 | 11,055 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 553 | 6,913 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.9 | 609 | 10,513 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.5 | 531 | 8,422 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.0 | 815 | 10,376 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 455 | 9,558 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.5 | 589 | 9,374 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 393 | 8,395 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 491 | 10,024 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 449 | 6,986 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 486 | 9,461 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 517 | 7,405 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 804 | 9,566 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 601 | 10,111 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Seraphine vs Gragas - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Seraphine do against Gragas in League of Legends?
Gragas wins the Seraphine vs Gragas matchup with a 58.3% win rate compared to Seraphine's 41.7%, a 16.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 12 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Seraphine do against Gragas in the early game?
In the early game, Seraphine has the advantage against Gragas with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Seraphine players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Seraphine do against Gragas in the late game?
In the late game, Gragas takes over the Seraphine vs Gragas matchup with a 83.3% win rate compared to 16.7%. Gragas scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Seraphine vs Gragas matchup?
Gragas wins the matchup against Seraphine with a 58.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 16.7 percentage point advantage means Gragas is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 12 games analyzed.
What is the best Seraphine build against Gragas?
The best Seraphine build against Gragas includes Luden's Echo, Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon with Sorcerer's Shoes. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Seraphine runes against Gragas?
The best Seraphine runes against Gragas use the Sorcery primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Seraphine vs Gragas matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Seraphine counter Gragas?
No, Seraphine struggles against Gragas with only a 41.7% win rate. Gragas has the advantage in this matchup. Seraphine players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Gragas's lead.
How do I play Seraphine against Gragas?
When playing Seraphine against Gragas, play cautiously and avoid Gragas's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Gragas has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.