Highest Win Rate TFT Team Compositions

This table showcases the TFT team compositions with the highest win rates, helping you identify the most successful comps for climbing ranked. Top 8-champion Set 17 compositions: N.O.V.A. (89.3% WR, 2.6 avg), Rogue (88.5% WR, 2.9 avg), N.O.V.A. (85.4% WR, 2.9 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler leads with 89.29% win rate and 2.64 average placement. Rogue follows at 88.52% win rate. Analyzing 55 8-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.64
Avg Place
89.29%
Top 4 Rate
29.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.91
Avg Place
88.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.93
Avg Place
85.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.41%
Top 4 Rate
28.29%
First Place
Low Contested
3.09
Avg Place
79.75%
Top 4 Rate
23.42%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.84%
Top 4 Rate
23.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
75.47%
Top 4 Rate
26.42%
First Place
Low Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.79%
Top 4 Rate
24.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.69
Avg Place
72.63%
Top 4 Rate
10.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.28
Avg Place
72.42%
Top 4 Rate
23.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.42
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
14.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.68%
Top 4 Rate
12.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.76
Avg Place
67.76%
Top 4 Rate
9.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
66.78%
Top 4 Rate
7.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.76
Avg Place
66.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.83
Avg Place
65.07%
Top 4 Rate
10.93%
First Place
Low Contested
3.76
Avg Place
64.15%
Top 4 Rate
14.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.87
Avg Place
59.68%
Top 4 Rate
17.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.04%
Top 4 Rate
14.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.25
Avg Place
55.33%
Top 4 Rate
6.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
-
4.31
Avg Place
53.25%
Top 4 Rate
7.53%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.46
Avg Place
50.20%
Top 4 Rate
8.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.53
Avg Place
50.20%
Top 4 Rate
8.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.62
Avg Place
47.83%
Top 4 Rate
6.14%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
5.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.71
Avg Place
46.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.97
Avg Place
42.69%
Top 4 Rate
2.31%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.90
Avg Place
41.42%
Top 4 Rate
8.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.99
Avg Place
40.92%
Top 4 Rate
6.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.18
Avg Place
39.48%
Top 4 Rate
3.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.96
Avg Place
39.34%
Top 4 Rate
4.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
38.00%
Top 4 Rate
2.50%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.03
Avg Place
37.43%
Top 4 Rate
6.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.34
Avg Place
33.60%
Top 4 Rate
2.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.51
Avg Place
32.68%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.32
Avg Place
32.17%
Top 4 Rate
1.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.34
Avg Place
30.13%
Top 4 Rate
3.40%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
29.74%
Top 4 Rate
5.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.76
Avg Place
28.44%
Top 4 Rate
0.46%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.46
Avg Place
28.13%
Top 4 Rate
5.10%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.48
Avg Place
27.63%
Top 4 Rate
2.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.38
Avg Place
27.54%
Top 4 Rate
1.93%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.56
Avg Place
26.46%
Top 4 Rate
1.06%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.61
Avg Place
26.45%
Top 4 Rate
1.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.55
Avg Place
26.06%
Top 4 Rate
1.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.72
Avg Place
25.43%
Top 4 Rate
0.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.56
Avg Place
25.24%
Top 4 Rate
2.59%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.61
Avg Place
24.81%
Top 4 Rate
2.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.63
Avg Place
24.61%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
22.28%
Top 4 Rate
1.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
21.69%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.98
Avg Place
19.34%
Top 4 Rate
1.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.15
Avg Place
18.99%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.79%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Low Contested
6.22
Avg Place
14.31%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 55 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 53.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 47.0% and average placement of 4.65 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 89.3% win rate. Following closely is Rogue/N.O.V.A. at 88.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Brawler at 85.4%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Miss Fortune

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 89.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A.: 88.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 85.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Rogue/Meeple with a 3.3% pick rate, though its 46.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Replicator/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

TFT Team Comps - Set 17 FAQ

What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 17?

The best TFT comp in TFT Set 17 is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 89.3% win rate and 2.64 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.

How do I play the N.O.V.A./Brawler comp?

To play N.O.V.A./Brawler, focus on building around Viktor as your main carry. Look for Viktor and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.

What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?

For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17, N.O.V.A./Brawler offers the best average placement at 2.64. Other reliable options include Party Animal/Sniper (2.80 avg) and Rogue/N.O.V.A. (2.91 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.

What is the easiest TFT comp to play?

N.O.V.A./Brawler is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 89.3% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.

When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 17?

In TFT Set 17, Rogue/Meeple has a 3.3% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like N.O.V.A./Brawler. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.