Archived Set: These comps are from TFT Set 16 and are no longer part of the current set. Stats shown are from when this set was active.

Best TFT Comps by Win Rate

This table showcases the TFT Set 16 team compositions with the highest win rates, helping you identify the most successful comps for climbing ranked. Top 9-champion Set 16 compositions: Defender (93.2% WR, 2.4 avg), Bruiser (91.9% WR, 2.6 avg), Blacksmith (91.3% WR, 2.5 avg). Defender/Disruptor leads with 93.19% win rate and 2.37 average placement. Bruiser follows at 91.88% win rate. Analyzing 55 9-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4FirstContested Risk
2.37
Avg Place
93.19%
Top 4 Rate
23.47%
First Place
Low Contested
2.56
Avg Place
91.88%
Top 4 Rate
24.35%
First Place
Low Contested
2.54
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
31.88%
First Place
Low Contested
2.00
Avg Place
90.67%
Top 4 Rate
45.33%
First Place
Low Contested
2.43
Avg Place
89.84%
Top 4 Rate
30.90%
First Place
Low Contested
2.54
Avg Place
89.70%
Top 4 Rate
29.09%
First Place
Low Contested
3.05
Avg Place
86.36%
Top 4 Rate
22.73%
First Place
Low Contested
2.43
Avg Place
86.00%
Top 4 Rate
38.51%
First Place
Low Contested
2.87
Avg Place
83.57%
Top 4 Rate
22.91%
First Place
Low Contested
2.55
Avg Place
82.61%
Top 4 Rate
31.88%
First Place
Low Contested
2.73
Avg Place
81.19%
Top 4 Rate
34.02%
First Place
Low Contested
2.80
Avg Place
80.92%
Top 4 Rate
33.06%
First Place
Low Contested
3.01
Avg Place
80.71%
Top 4 Rate
22.55%
First Place
Low Contested
2.97
Avg Place
79.39%
Top 4 Rate
27.43%
First Place
Low Contested
2.90
Avg Place
78.85%
Top 4 Rate
31.07%
First Place
Low Contested
3.01
Avg Place
78.82%
Top 4 Rate
25.12%
First Place
Low Contested
3.10
Avg Place
78.61%
Top 4 Rate
22.08%
First Place
Low Contested
2.92
Avg Place
78.50%
Top 4 Rate
31.06%
First Place
Low Contested
3.39
Avg Place
78.12%
Top 4 Rate
12.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.00
Avg Place
77.43%
Top 4 Rate
26.57%
First Place
Low Contested
2.98
Avg Place
77.21%
Top 4 Rate
33.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.04
Avg Place
77.18%
Top 4 Rate
27.51%
First Place
Low Contested
3.01
Avg Place
77.17%
Top 4 Rate
31.08%
First Place
Low Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.88%
Top 4 Rate
30.40%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.23
Avg Place
76.36%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Low Contested
3.33
Avg Place
75.99%
Top 4 Rate
21.11%
First Place
Low Contested
3.15
Avg Place
74.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.33%
First Place
Low Contested
3.42
Avg Place
74.27%
Top 4 Rate
19.69%
First Place
Low Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.67%
Top 4 Rate
27.56%
First Place
Low Contested
3.12
Avg Place
73.65%
Top 4 Rate
30.39%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.41
Avg Place
73.19%
Top 4 Rate
16.53%
First Place
Low Contested
3.26
Avg Place
73.06%
Top 4 Rate
23.94%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.30
Avg Place
72.88%
Top 4 Rate
22.99%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
13.64%
First Place
Low Contested
3.25
Avg Place
72.32%
Top 4 Rate
24.40%
First Place
Low Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.30%
Top 4 Rate
11.95%
First Place
Low Contested
3.51
Avg Place
71.91%
Top 4 Rate
15.30%
First Place
Low Contested
3.36
Avg Place
71.90%
Top 4 Rate
22.77%
First Place
Low Contested
3.37
Avg Place
71.85%
Top 4 Rate
22.52%
First Place
Low Contested
3.29
Avg Place
71.79%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Low Contested
3.43
Avg Place
71.58%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Low Contested
3.35
Avg Place
71.15%
Top 4 Rate
25.52%
First Place
Low Contested
3.41
Avg Place
71.15%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Low Contested
3.59
Avg Place
68.62%
Top 4 Rate
15.99%
First Place
Low Contested
4.03
Avg Place
62.42%
Top 4 Rate
10.09%
First Place
Low Contested
3.96
Avg Place
59.66%
Top 4 Rate
15.87%
First Place
Low Contested
4.12
Avg Place
58.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.19%
First Place
Low Contested
4.51
Avg Place
50.52%
Top 4 Rate
7.22%
First Place
Low Contested
4.36
Avg Place
50.27%
Top 4 Rate
7.47%
First Place
Low Contested
4.63
Avg Place
48.77%
Top 4 Rate
6.13%
First Place
Low Contested
4.49
Avg Place
45.89%
Top 4 Rate
5.70%
First Place
Low Contested
4.65
Avg Place
45.05%
Top 4 Rate
3.07%
First Place
Low Contested
5.54
Avg Place
37.50%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Low Contested
4.95
Avg Place
36.71%
Top 4 Rate
5.70%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.52
Avg Place
28.16%
Top 4 Rate
4.21%
First Place
Low Contested

TFT Set 16 Meta Analysis

This page displays 55 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 41.6K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.1% and average placement of 3.36 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Defender/Disruptor with Zoe as the primary carry, achieving a 93.2% win rate. Following closely is Bruiser/Caretaker at 91.9% win rate, and Blacksmith/Defender at 91.3%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Defender/Disruptor (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Zoe
  • Bruiser/Caretaker (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Sion
  • Blacksmith/Defender (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jinx

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Bruiser/Defender which achieves first place in 45.3% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Bruiser/Defender offers the best average placement at 2.00.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Defender/Disruptor: 93.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Bruiser/Caretaker: 91.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Blacksmith/Defender: 91.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Blacksmith/Harvester with a 1.0% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 78.6% win rate despite high contestation. Defender/Demacia follows at 0.5% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

TFT Set 16 Comps FAQ

What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 16?

The best TFT comp in TFT Set 16 is Defender/Disruptor with Zoe as the primary carry, achieving a 93.2% win rate and 2.37 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.

How do I play the Defender/Disruptor comp?

To play Defender/Disruptor, focus on building around Zoe as your main carry. Look for Zoe and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.

What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 16?

For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 16, Bruiser/Defender offers the best average placement at 2.00. Other reliable options include Defender/Disruptor (2.37 avg) and Star Forger/Defender (2.43 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.

What is the easiest TFT comp to play?

Defender/Disruptor is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 93.2% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.

When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 16?

In TFT Set 16, Blacksmith/Harvester has a 1.0% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Defender/Disruptor. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.

Which comps have the highest win rates in TFT Set 16?

The top 3 win rate comps are: 1) Defender/Disruptor (93.2%), 2) Bruiser/Caretaker (91.9%), and 3) Blacksmith/Defender (91.3%). These represent the strongest compositions for maximizing LP in ranked games.

Why does win rate matter for TFT comps?

Win rate shows how often a composition achieves top 4 placement, which gains LP in ranked. High win rate comps like Defender/Disruptor (93.2%) consistently perform well across many games. However, also consider pick rate—heavily contested comps may underperform in your games if multiple players force them.