Cassiopeiavs Warwick
Cassiopeia vs Warwick is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Warwick wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Cassiopeia based on 5 games. Warwick wins the early laning phase while Cassiopeia scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Cassiopeia vs Warwick matchup.
Cassiopeia Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Cassiopeia performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Warwick(40.0%)Who Wins the Cassiopeia vs Warwick Matchup?
Cassiopeia vs Warwick Matchup Summary
The Cassiopeia vs Warwick matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Warwick wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 40.0%, giving Warwick a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Warwick controls the early laning stage, but Cassiopeia outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Warwick needs to press advantages before Cassiopeia reaches their power spikes, while Cassiopeia should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Warwick leads by 717 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Warwick has a strong advantage in this matchup. Cassiopeia players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Warwick overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Cassiopeia vs Warwick Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Warwick, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Cassiopeia Build Against Warwick
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Warwick, providing the mobility and stats Cassiopeia needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Cassiopeia against Warwick are Liandry's Torment, Fimbulwinter and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Cassiopeia an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Warwick. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Cassiopeia vs Warwick matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Cassiopeia0.0%Warwick100.0%Cassiopeia66.7%Warwick33.3%Warwick dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Cassiopeia. This lopsided early game means Warwick can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Warwick. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Warwick must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Cassiopeia reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Cassiopeia survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Cassiopeia Runes Against Warwick
Sorcery
Precision
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Cassiopeia the best tools to compete against Warwick in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Cassiopeia matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Cassiopeia's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Cassiopeia build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.00% | 50 | 6.5 | 752 | 10,644 | 41.7% | 46.1% | |
| 60.42% | 48 | 6.5 | 825 | 11,599 | 71.4% | 51.9% | |
| 46.81% | 47 | 6.7 | 752 | 11,717 | 60.9% | 33.3% | |
| 55.32% | 47 | 6.7 | 965 | 11,087 | 42.9% | 65.4% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 6.7 | 899 | 11,206 | 35.0% | 80.0% | |
| 65.71% | 35 | 6.9 | 870 | 12,822 | 53.9% | 72.7% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 6.5 | 780 | 12,310 | 72.7% | 34.8% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 6.5 | 730 | 11,324 | 35.7% | 52.9% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 6.8 | 1,016 | 11,665 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 6.1 | 795 | 11,990 | 41.7% | 47.4% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 6.1 | 882 | 12,213 | 30.0% | 61.9% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 6.0 | 788 | 10,687 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 6.0 | 683 | 12,031 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 6.5 | 887 | 12,091 | 46.1% | 73.3% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 6.4 | 764 | 11,037 | 40.0% | 72.2% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 6.4 | 761 | 12,050 | 44.4% | 72.2% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 6.6 | 713 | 10,814 | 33.3% | 47.1% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 6.8 | 767 | 11,184 | 53.9% | 40.0% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 5.9 | 835 | 10,563 | 27.3% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 7.1 | 821 | 11,367 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.2 | 964 | 12,857 | 14.3% | 53.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.3 | 945 | 13,134 | 55.6% | 38.5% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.7 | 889 | 12,652 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.6 | 941 | 11,750 | 40.0% | 46.7% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 6.8 | 744 | 11,089 | 44.4% | 36.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.6 | 878 | 12,148 | 25.0% | 63.6% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.4 | 736 | 11,251 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.5 | 916 | 13,547 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.7 | 848 | 12,633 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.4 | 790 | 13,686 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.5 | 960 | 9,726 | 41.7% | 60.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.9 | 711 | 13,003 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.7 | 802 | 11,070 | 44.4% | 62.5% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 6.0 | 715 | 9,805 | 54.5% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.6 | 854 | 11,898 | 57.1% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.3 | 945 | 13,736 | 85.7% | 22.2% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 7.0 | 977 | 10,832 | 42.9% | 37.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 7.0 | 874 | 11,340 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.9 | 702 | 10,410 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 5.7 | 794 | 8,414 | 37.5% | 20.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.6 | 761 | 11,192 | 60.0% | 37.5% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 6.8 | 905 | 13,974 | 33.3% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.5 | 799 | 11,097 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 7.0 | 801 | 12,408 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.4 | 747 | 10,775 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.1 | 958 | 12,438 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.6 | 773 | 10,663 | 85.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 7.0 | 998 | 13,351 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.8 | 838 | 11,201 | 33.3% | 28.6% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 745 | 10,830 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 902 | 10,672 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 7.2 | 887 | 10,780 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.1 | 803 | 12,873 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 968 | 11,160 | 75.0% | 16.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 842 | 10,170 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 885 | 12,754 | 40.0% | 80.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 7.2 | 991 | 12,562 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.8 | 1,001 | 12,548 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.5 | 821 | 13,313 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.4 | 796 | 10,675 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.8 | 827 | 10,105 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.2 | 1,039 | 14,564 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.0 | 854 | 10,667 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 1,001 | 13,385 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.2 | 1,027 | 11,948 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.1 | 883 | 12,649 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 957 | 14,159 | 100.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 959 | 12,556 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 856 | 11,497 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.0 | 936 | 14,709 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.6 | 621 | 11,261 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.9 | 792 | 11,524 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.7 | 1,088 | 12,422 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.1 | 612 | 9,940 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.7 | 610 | 11,249 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.3 | 905 | 9,537 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.0 | 747 | 13,494 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 737 | 10,088 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.7 | 977 | 11,605 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.9 | 784 | 11,961 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 1,106 | 14,371 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 831 | 12,260 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 1,256 | 13,312 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.6 | 743 | 11,830 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 570 | 6,625 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 782 | 11,624 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 939 | 15,072 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 750 | 12,129 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Cassiopeia vs Warwick - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Cassiopeia do against Warwick in League of Legends?
Warwick wins the Cassiopeia vs Warwick matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Cassiopeia do against Warwick in the early game?
In the early game, Warwick has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Warwick players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Cassiopeia do against Warwick in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Cassiopeia vs Warwick matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Cassiopeia vs Warwick matchup?
Warwick wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Warwick is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Cassiopeia build against Warwick?
The best Cassiopeia build against Warwick includes Liandry's Torment, Fimbulwinter, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Cassiopeia runes against Warwick?
The best Cassiopeia runes against Warwick use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Cassiopeia vs Warwick matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Cassiopeia counter Warwick?
No, Cassiopeia struggles against Warwick with only a 40.0% win rate. Warwick has the advantage in this matchup. Cassiopeia players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Warwick's lead.
How do I play Cassiopeia against Warwick?
When playing Cassiopeia against Warwick, play cautiously and avoid Warwick's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Warwick in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.