Most Popular TFT Comps by Pick Rate
This table displays the most commonly played TFT Set 16 team compositions based on pick rate, showing current meta trends and popular strategies. Top 8-champion Set 16 compositions: Bruiser/Defender (68.2% top 4, 3.66 avg place, 4,284 games); Defender/Yordle (36.2% top 4, 5.25 avg place, 1,388 games); Bilgewater/Bruiser (27.0% top 4, 5.64 avg place, 2,110 games). Bruiser/Defender leads with a 68.2% top-4 rate and 3.66 average placement. Defender/Yordle follows at 36.2%. Analyzing 49 8-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg Place 3.66 | Top 4 68.18% | First Place 15.34% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.47 | Top 4 51.95% | First Place 6.18% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.25 | Top 4 36.17% | First Place 3.03% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.48 | Top 4 73.46% | First Place 11.58% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.75 | Top 4 67.17% | First Place 11.88% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.59 | Top 4 45.65% | First Place 4.88% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.13 | Top 4 39.70% | First Place 2.58% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.47 | Top 4 51.03% | First Place 8.04% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.39 | Top 4 52.26% | First Place 5.97% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.59 | Top 4 26.72% | First Place 1.72% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.25 | Top 4 35.47% | First Place 3.57% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.01 | Top 4 79.45% | First Place 24.66% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.89 | Top 4 43.08% | First Place 6.75% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.64 | Top 4 26.97% | First Place 2.65% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.39 | Top 4 31.50% | First Place 5.05% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.25 | Top 4 55.73% | First Place 10.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.92 | Top 4 18.91% | First Place 2.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.93 | Top 4 61.45% | First Place 10.34% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.13 | Top 4 36.93% | First Place 4.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 6.46 | Top 4 16.67% | First Place 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.25 | Top 4 77.81% | First Place 17.72% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.81 | Top 4 22.22% | First Place 4.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.19 | Top 4 34.17% | First Place 5.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.55 | Top 4 27.27% | First Place 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.65 | Top 4 25.42% | First Place 1.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.94 | Top 4 21.08% | First Place 0.97% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.40 | Top 4 54.98% | First Place 8.84% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.50 | Top 4 52.88% | First Place 4.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.19 | Top 4 37.04% | First Place 3.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.81 | Top 4 82.51% | First Place 28.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.55 | Top 4 70.00% | First Place 13.76% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.22 | Top 4 32.04% | First Place 1.94% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.24 | Top 4 77.63% | First Place 13.90% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.21 | Top 4 35.98% | First Place 4.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.16 | Top 4 56.10% | First Place 8.87% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.27 | Top 4 74.37% | First Place 20.49% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.09 | Top 4 61.05% | First Place 16.84% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.25 | Top 4 35.65% | First Place 3.66% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.73 | Top 4 43.79% | First Place 7.33% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.97 | Top 4 39.73% | First Place 5.75% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.73 | Top 4 25.34% | First Place 0.55% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.44 | Top 4 72.15% | First Place 18.79% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.49 | Top 4 50.12% | First Place 6.05% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.14 | Top 4 36.24% | First Place 5.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 71.47% | First Place 15.11% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.19 | Top 4 58.18% | First Place 7.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.29 | Top 4 71.43% | First Place 23.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.29 | Top 4 52.62% | First Place 13.67% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.65 | Top 4 71.87% | First Place 12.23% | Low Contested Risk | |||
The Best Comps, Right in Your Game
The Recommended Comps overlay shows the strongest meta comps matched to the traits and units you're already running — with win rate, average placement, and 1st-place odds — without ever leaving TFT.
- Meta comps without alt-tabbing
- Matched to your current traits
- Win rate, avg place & 1st odds
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Set 16 Comps FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 16?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 16 is Bruiser/Defender with Draven as the primary carry, finishing top 4 in 82.5% of games with a 2.81 average placement. That consistency is what climbs ranked.
How do I play the Bruiser/Defender comp?
To play Bruiser/Defender, focus on building around Draven as your main carry. Look for Draven and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 16?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 16, Bruiser/Defender offers the best average placement at 2.81. Other reliable options include Juggernaut/Disruptor (3.01 avg) and Caretaker/Defender (3.24 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Bruiser/Defender is a good pick for an easier climb: it finishes top 4 in 82.5% of games but only 0.1% of players pick it, so you are unlikely to be contested and can find your units without forced pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 16?
In TFT Set 16, Defender/Disruptor has a 1.2% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Bruiser/Defender. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the current TFT meta in TFT Set 16?
The TFT Set 16 meta is dominated by Defender/Disruptor with 1.2% pick rate, followed by Defender/Arcanist at 1.0%. High pick rate comps define the meta but are often contested. For uncontested games, consider less popular alternatives like Bilgewater/Blacksmith (0.1% pick rate).
Should I avoid playing popular comps in TFT?
Not necessarily. Popular comps like Defender/Disruptor (1.2% pick rate) are popular for a reason—they're strong. However, when multiple players contest the same comp, everyone's placement suffers. Scout your lobby early. If 2+ players are forcing the same comp, pivot to alternatives to avoid fighting for units.