Most Popular TFT Comps by Pick Rate
This table displays the most commonly played TFT Set 16 team compositions based on pick rate, showing current meta trends and popular strategies. Top 8-champion Set 16 compositions: Blacksmith (35.5% WR, 5.3 avg), Defender (55.7% WR, 4.3 avg), Juggernaut (26.7% WR, 5.6 avg). Blacksmith/Disruptor leads with 35.47% win rate and 5.25 average placement. Defender follows at 55.73% win rate. Analyzing 49 8-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.25 Avg Place | 35.47% Top 4 Rate | 3.57% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.25 Avg Place | 55.73% Top 4 Rate | 10.06% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.59 Avg Place | 26.72% Top 4 Rate | 1.72% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 71.47% Top 4 Rate | 15.11% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.19 Avg Place | 58.18% Top 4 Rate | 7.38% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.47 Avg Place | 51.03% Top 4 Rate | 8.04% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.13 Avg Place | 39.70% Top 4 Rate | 2.58% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.49 Avg Place | 50.12% Top 4 Rate | 6.05% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 39.73% Top 4 Rate | 5.75% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.59 Avg Place | 45.65% Top 4 Rate | 4.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.13 Avg Place | 36.93% Top 4 Rate | 4.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.65 Avg Place | 71.87% Top 4 Rate | 12.23% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.14 Avg Place | 36.24% Top 4 Rate | 5.00% First Place | Low Contested | |||
3.66 Avg Place | 68.18% Top 4 Rate | 15.34% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.73 Avg Place | 25.34% Top 4 Rate | 0.55% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 3.44 Avg Place | 72.15% Top 4 Rate | 18.79% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.94 Avg Place | 21.08% Top 4 Rate | 0.97% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 73.46% Top 4 Rate | 11.58% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.21 Avg Place | 35.98% Top 4 Rate | 4.06% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.47 Avg Place | 51.95% Top 4 Rate | 6.18% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 67.17% Top 4 Rate | 11.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 54.98% Top 4 Rate | 8.84% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.16 Avg Place | 56.10% Top 4 Rate | 8.87% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.19 Avg Place | 34.17% Top 4 Rate | 5.38% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.00% Top 4 Rate | 13.76% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.24 Avg Place | 77.63% Top 4 Rate | 13.90% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 79.45% Top 4 Rate | 24.66% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.19 Avg Place | 37.04% Top 4 Rate | 3.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.39 Avg Place | 31.50% Top 4 Rate | 5.05% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 74.37% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.25 Avg Place | 36.17% Top 4 Rate | 3.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.50 Avg Place | 52.88% Top 4 Rate | 4.81% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.81 Avg Place | 22.22% Top 4 Rate | 4.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.65 Avg Place | 25.42% Top 4 Rate | 1.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.92 Avg Place | 18.91% Top 4 Rate | 2.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.64 Avg Place | 26.97% Top 4 Rate | 2.65% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.73 Avg Place | 43.79% Top 4 Rate | 7.33% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.81 Avg Place | 82.51% Top 4 Rate | 28.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.89 Avg Place | 43.08% Top 4 Rate | 6.75% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 77.81% Top 4 Rate | 17.72% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.55 Avg Place | 27.27% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 61.45% Top 4 Rate | 10.34% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.29 Avg Place | 52.62% Top 4 Rate | 13.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.46 Avg Place | 16.67% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 71.43% Top 4 Rate | 23.81% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.39 Avg Place | 52.26% Top 4 Rate | 5.97% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.25 Avg Place | 35.65% Top 4 Rate | 3.66% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 61.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.84% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.22 Avg Place | 32.04% Top 4 Rate | 1.94% First Place | Low Contested |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Set 16 Comps FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 16?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 16 is Bruiser/Defender with Draven as the primary carry, achieving a 82.5% win rate and 2.81 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Bruiser/Defender comp?
To play Bruiser/Defender, focus on building around Draven as your main carry. Look for Draven and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 16?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 16, Bruiser/Defender offers the best average placement at 2.81. Other reliable options include Juggernaut/Disruptor (3.01 avg) and Caretaker/Defender (3.24 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Bruiser/Defender is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 82.5% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 16?
In TFT Set 16, Defender/Disruptor has a 1.2% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Bruiser/Defender. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the current TFT meta in TFT Set 16?
The TFT Set 16 meta is dominated by Defender/Disruptor with 1.2% pick rate, followed by Defender/Yordle at 1.0%. High pick rate comps define the meta but are often contested. For uncontested games, consider less popular alternatives like Bilgewater/Blacksmith (0.1% pick rate).
Should I avoid playing popular comps in TFT?
Not necessarily. Popular comps like Defender/Disruptor (1.2% pick rate) are popular for a reason—they're strong. However, when multiple players contest the same comp, everyone's placement suffers. Scout your lobby early. If 2+ players are forcing the same comp, pivot to alternatives to avoid fighting for units.