Best TFT Comps by Placement
This table ranks TFT Set 16 team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top 8-champion Set 16 compositions: Bruiser (82.5% WR, 2.8 avg), Juggernaut (79.5% WR, 3.0 avg), Caretaker (77.6% WR, 3.2 avg). Bruiser/Defender leads with 82.51% win rate and 2.81 average placement. Juggernaut follows at 79.45% win rate. Analyzing 49 8-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
The Best Comps, Right in Your Game
The Recommended Comps overlay shows the strongest meta comps matched to the traits and units you're already running — with win rate, average placement, and 1st-place odds — without ever leaving TFT.
- Meta comps without alt-tabbing
- Matched to your current traits
- Win rate, avg place & 1st odds
Primary | Champions | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg Place 2.81 | Top 4 82.51% | First Place 28.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.01 | Top 4 79.45% | First Place 24.66% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.24 | Top 4 77.63% | First Place 13.90% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.25 | Top 4 77.81% | First Place 17.72% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.27 | Top 4 74.37% | First Place 20.49% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.29 | Top 4 71.43% | First Place 23.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.44 | Top 4 72.15% | First Place 18.79% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 71.47% | First Place 15.11% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.48 | Top 4 73.46% | First Place 11.58% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.55 | Top 4 70.00% | First Place 13.76% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.65 | Top 4 71.87% | First Place 12.23% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.66 | Top 4 68.18% | First Place 15.34% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.75 | Top 4 67.17% | First Place 11.88% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.93 | Top 4 61.45% | First Place 10.34% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.09 | Top 4 61.05% | First Place 16.84% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.16 | Top 4 56.10% | First Place 8.87% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.19 | Top 4 58.18% | First Place 7.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.25 | Top 4 55.73% | First Place 10.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.29 | Top 4 52.62% | First Place 13.67% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.39 | Top 4 52.26% | First Place 5.97% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.40 | Top 4 54.98% | First Place 8.84% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.47 | Top 4 51.95% | First Place 6.18% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.47 | Top 4 51.03% | First Place 8.04% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.49 | Top 4 50.12% | First Place 6.05% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.50 | Top 4 52.88% | First Place 4.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.59 | Top 4 45.65% | First Place 4.88% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.73 | Top 4 43.79% | First Place 7.33% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.89 | Top 4 43.08% | First Place 6.75% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.97 | Top 4 39.73% | First Place 5.75% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.13 | Top 4 39.70% | First Place 2.58% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.13 | Top 4 36.93% | First Place 4.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.14 | Top 4 36.24% | First Place 5.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.19 | Top 4 34.17% | First Place 5.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.19 | Top 4 37.04% | First Place 3.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.21 | Top 4 35.98% | First Place 4.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.22 | Top 4 32.04% | First Place 1.94% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.25 | Top 4 36.17% | First Place 3.03% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.25 | Top 4 35.47% | First Place 3.57% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.25 | Top 4 35.65% | First Place 3.66% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.39 | Top 4 31.50% | First Place 5.05% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.55 | Top 4 27.27% | First Place 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.59 | Top 4 26.72% | First Place 1.72% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.64 | Top 4 26.97% | First Place 2.65% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.65 | Top 4 25.42% | First Place 1.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.73 | Top 4 25.34% | First Place 0.55% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.81 | Top 4 22.22% | First Place 4.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.92 | Top 4 18.91% | First Place 2.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.94 | Top 4 21.08% | First Place 0.97% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 6.46 | Top 4 16.67% | First Place 0.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Set 16 Comps FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 16?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 16 is Bruiser/Defender with Draven as the primary carry, achieving a 82.5% win rate and 2.81 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Bruiser/Defender comp?
To play Bruiser/Defender, focus on building around Draven as your main carry. Look for Draven and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 16?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 16, Bruiser/Defender offers the best average placement at 2.81. Other reliable options include Juggernaut/Disruptor (3.01 avg) and Caretaker/Defender (3.24 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Bruiser/Defender is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 82.5% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 16?
In TFT Set 16, Defender/Disruptor has a 1.2% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Bruiser/Defender. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
What is the most consistent TFT comp in TFT Set 16?
Bruiser/Defender has the best average placement at 2.81, making it the most consistent comp for climbing. Juggernaut/Disruptor follows at 3.01, and Caretaker/Defender at 3.24. Lower average placement means fewer bottom 4 finishes.
Is average placement better than win rate for climbing?
For consistent LP gains, average placement is often more reliable than pure win rate. A comp like Bruiser/Defender with 2.81 average placement minimizes big LP losses from bottom 4 finishes. High variance comps might win more lobbies but also 8th more often. For climbing, consistency usually beats coinflip strategies.