Brandvs Xin Zhao
Brand vs Xin Zhao is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Brand wins with a 52.5% win rate (+5.0%) over Xin Zhao based on 40 games. Xin Zhao wins the early laning phase while Brand scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Brand vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Brand vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Xin Zhao matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 40 recent matches analyzed, Brand wins with a 52.5% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 47.5%, giving Brand a 5.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Xin Zhao controls the early laning stage, but Brand outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Xin Zhao needs to press advantages before Brand reaches their power spikes, while Brand should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Xin Zhao leads by 1,106 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Brand has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Xin Zhao's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Brand Build Against Xin Zhao
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Brand needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Brand against Xin Zhao are Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Brand an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Brand vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand40.0%
Xin Zhao60.0%Brand60.0%Xin Zhao40.0%Xin Zhao dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 60.0% win rate — a 20.0 percentage point lead over Brand. This lopsided early game means Xin Zhao can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Brand is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 60.0% win rate — 20.0 points above Xin Zhao. Extended games heavily favor Brand, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Xin Zhao must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Brand reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Brand survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Brand Runes Against Xin Zhao
Sorcery
Precision
Running Sorcery primary with Precision secondary allows Brand to press their advantage against Xin Zhao, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.65% | 364 | 2.8 | 768 | 10,365 | 55.9% | 48.9% | |
| 49.09% | 330 | 2.2 | 819 | 10,075 | 46.6% | 50.8% | |
| 53.67% | 300 | 6.3 | 1,035 | 12,494 | 58.6% | 50.0% | |
| 54.34% | 265 | 5.9 | 1,041 | 13,019 | 60.6% | 50.3% | |
| 49.79% | 237 | 3.0 | 902 | 10,867 | 54.7% | 46.5% | |
| 52.89% | 225 | 6.2 | 983 | 12,441 | 60.0% | 48.1% | |
| 52.47% | 223 | 6.0 | 1,057 | 12,764 | 58.8% | 49.0% | |
| 50.23% | 219 | 1.9 | 861 | 9,923 | 56.1% | 45.5% | |
| 48.37% | 215 | 1.9 | 868 | 9,878 | 51.6% | 46.0% | |
| 50.00% | 210 | 6.2 | 1,019 | 11,746 | 60.6% | 41.4% | |
| 53.62% | 207 | 1.8 | 877 | 10,263 | 60.2% | 49.2% | |
| 53.20% | 203 | 1.8 | 846 | 9,950 | 56.4% | 51.2% | |
| 44.55% | 202 | 6.2 | 1,105 | 13,032 | 57.0% | 36.6% | |
| 43.98% | 191 | 2.1 | 825 | 10,043 | 49.3% | 41.1% | |
| 54.60% | 163 | 6.3 | 1,006 | 12,695 | 55.6% | 54.0% | |
| 51.90% | 158 | 3.0 | 845 | 11,223 | 48.1% | 53.8% | |
| 54.23% | 142 | 3.1 | 1,005 | 11,300 | 56.6% | 52.8% | |
| 40.29% | 139 | 3.6 | 787 | 10,244 | 42.1% | 39.0% | |
| 51.09% | 137 | 6.1 | 1,024 | 12,423 | 54.8% | 49.5% | |
| 51.91% | 131 | 3.7 | 871 | 10,816 | 40.9% | 57.5% | |
| 48.03% | 127 | 2.1 | 830 | 10,515 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 50.41% | 121 | 1.8 | 784 | 9,904 | 51.2% | 50.0% | |
| 59.83% | 117 | 6.3 | 1,067 | 13,102 | 61.2% | 58.8% | |
| 58.62% | 116 | 2.0 | 864 | 11,278 | 66.7% | 55.4% | |
| 51.35% | 111 | 1.8 | 842 | 9,601 | 61.2% | 43.5% | |
| 47.75% | 111 | 5.3 | 1,024 | 11,488 | 46.5% | 48.5% | |
| 60.55% | 109 | 5.6 | 1,047 | 11,359 | 55.6% | 64.1% | |
| 42.99% | 107 | 1.9 | 910 | 10,199 | 51.2% | 37.9% | |
| 49.48% | 97 | 2.1 | 1,033 | 10,488 | 46.1% | 51.7% | |
| 55.21% | 96 | 5.9 | 989 | 11,633 | 55.6% | 55.0% | |
| 54.17% | 96 | 5.9 | 1,075 | 12,844 | 55.6% | 53.3% | |
| 43.16% | 95 | 6.4 | 1,042 | 12,833 | 53.3% | 38.5% | |
| 58.51% | 94 | 2.4 | 846 | 10,284 | 58.3% | 58.6% | |
| 45.74% | 94 | 1.9 | 807 | 10,063 | 55.6% | 39.7% | |
| 59.14% | 93 | 5.8 | 962 | 13,109 | 74.2% | 51.6% | |
| 58.62% | 87 | 1.8 | 834 | 9,673 | 73.2% | 45.6% | |
| 55.29% | 85 | 6.0 | 1,058 | 12,867 | 51.4% | 58.0% | |
| 50.60% | 83 | 1.7 | 671 | 9,264 | 51.2% | 50.0% | |
| 53.09% | 81 | 6.3 | 1,078 | 12,052 | 51.3% | 54.8% | |
| 59.74% | 77 | 2.0 | 907 | 10,473 | 59.4% | 60.0% | |
| 57.97% | 69 | 5.8 | 1,063 | 13,172 | 61.1% | 56.9% | |
| 60.29% | 68 | 1.8 | 875 | 10,679 | 44.4% | 66.0% | |
| 57.58% | 66 | 1.9 | 831 | 10,195 | 56.0% | 58.5% | |
| 45.31% | 64 | 1.8 | 813 | 9,728 | 44.0% | 46.1% | |
| 55.56% | 63 | 6.4 | 979 | 12,275 | 57.7% | 54.0% | |
| 58.06% | 62 | 5.9 | 926 | 13,155 | 81.0% | 46.3% | |
| 51.61% | 62 | 4.5 | 995 | 12,078 | 44.0% | 56.8% | |
| 56.67% | 60 | 5.8 | 1,016 | 11,266 | 55.0% | 57.5% | |
| 39.66% | 58 | 5.6 | 1,001 | 11,902 | 17.6% | 48.8% | |
| 55.17% | 58 | 6.6 | 979 | 11,618 | 52.0% | 57.6% | |
| 48.28% | 58 | 1.9 | 947 | 10,228 | 66.7% | 37.8% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 4.0 | 1,035 | 11,343 | 42.1% | 52.6% | |
| 60.71% | 56 | 1.8 | 774 | 10,244 | 76.5% | 53.9% | |
| 46.43% | 56 | 4.5 | 930 | 11,385 | 45.8% | 46.9% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 6.7 | 1,035 | 13,504 | 52.2% | 51.5% | |
| 56.36% | 55 | 6.2 | 1,011 | 12,990 | 60.9% | 53.1% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 4.9 | 911 | 10,576 | 60.9% | 53.3% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 5.1 | 1,054 | 10,623 | 40.7% | 45.8% | |
| 56.00% | 50 | 5.8 | 948 | 11,616 | 52.6% | 58.1% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 5.2 | 838 | 10,509 | 56.5% | 46.1% | |
| 44.90% | 49 | 4.5 | 944 | 9,811 | 37.0% | 54.5% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 6.7 | 1,015 | 10,975 | 52.0% | 30.4% | |
| 61.70% | 47 | 2.3 | 891 | 10,964 | 62.5% | 61.3% | |
| 54.35% | 46 | 5.1 | 897 | 9,991 | 47.4% | 59.3% | |
| 65.22% | 46 | 2.2 | 890 | 10,258 | 70.0% | 61.5% | |
| 42.22% | 45 | 1.9 | 877 | 9,931 | 45.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.22% | 45 | 6.0 | 902 | 10,941 | 50.0% | 36.0% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 1.8 | 771 | 9,745 | 63.2% | 44.0% | |
| 38.64% | 44 | 5.2 | 932 | 11,418 | 37.5% | 39.3% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 3.0 | 917 | 11,389 | 38.9% | 52.0% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 4.2 | 1,064 | 11,448 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 5.3 | 1,029 | 11,740 | 27.3% | 48.3% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 5.0 | 904 | 11,208 | 50.0% | 56.5% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 2.1 | 895 | 12,338 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 64.86% | 37 | 6.5 | 964 | 12,800 | 76.5% | 55.0% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 5.8 | 946 | 11,197 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 5.7 | 798 | 10,158 | 52.6% | 60.0% | |
| 64.71% | 34 | 4.5 | 927 | 11,172 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 40.63% | 32 | 5.6 | 911 | 11,230 | 41.7% | 40.0% | |
| 81.25% | 32 | 6.2 | 1,047 | 13,786 | 81.8% | 81.0% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.9 | 861 | 9,789 | 53.9% | 44.4% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 3.6 | 1,011 | 10,414 | 61.5% | 55.6% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 3.1 | 967 | 9,736 | 64.3% | 50.0% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 1.6 | 773 | 9,918 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 5.8 | 969 | 12,224 | 60.0% | 58.8% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 4.5 | 1,278 | 12,100 | 37.5% | 55.6% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 5.8 | 1,012 | 12,186 | 57.1% | 63.2% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 5.3 | 959 | 10,596 | 41.7% | 21.4% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 4.5 | 913 | 11,416 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 28.00% | 25 | 6.2 | 1,081 | 12,638 | 30.8% | 25.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 1.6 | 795 | 11,400 | 45.5% | 46.1% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.6 | 969 | 11,795 | 57.1% | 52.9% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 4.7 | 875 | 10,599 | 50.0% | 23.1% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.0 | 1,058 | 12,902 | 44.4% | 61.5% | |
| 68.18% | 22 | 6.4 | 1,040 | 12,183 | 77.8% | 61.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.2 | 952 | 13,411 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.4 | 760 | 10,103 | 37.5% | 38.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.9 | 793 | 8,474 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.0 | 1,081 | 11,246 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.5 | 901 | 11,628 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 4.3 | 858 | 10,799 | 37.5% | 45.5% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 3.7 | 1,024 | 12,966 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 1.9 | 929 | 12,423 | 80.0% | 57.1% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 2.4 | 873 | 12,452 | 85.7% | 58.3% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 4.4 | 1,021 | 11,009 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 6.2 | 1,202 | 13,906 | 80.0% | 71.4% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.8 | 862 | 9,915 | 37.5% | 72.7% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.4 | 1,131 | 10,412 | 77.8% | 55.6% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 5.0 | 934 | 10,238 | 40.0% | 12.5% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 5.8 | 1,158 | 12,625 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 2.0 | 853 | 12,695 | 57.1% | 36.4% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 2.6 | 944 | 13,498 | 75.0% | 64.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.7 | 1,210 | 12,529 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 18.75% | 16 | 2.1 | 870 | 12,247 | 0.0% | 27.3% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.3 | 991 | 10,982 | 55.6% | 57.1% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.6 | 974 | 11,952 | 57.1% | 55.6% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 1.3 | 989 | 12,275 | 25.0% | 54.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 4.7 | 1,201 | 11,837 | 100.0% | 30.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.4 | 948 | 11,763 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.6 | 951 | 12,342 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 4.9 | 1,038 | 10,423 | 14.3% | 42.9% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 5.1 | 936 | 11,994 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.4 | 1,063 | 11,660 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.6 | 766 | 9,928 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 4.4 | 1,132 | 10,651 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 6.5 | 1,034 | 12,503 | 83.3% | 57.1% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.2 | 1,104 | 11,651 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 1.5 | 988 | 12,513 | 83.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 4.6 | 925 | 11,948 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 4.3 | 857 | 11,010 | 66.7% | 83.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.2 | 744 | 11,173 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.2 | 745 | 11,893 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.9 | 1,115 | 11,893 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.4 | 650 | 9,651 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 1,063 | 11,850 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 1,125 | 15,037 | 25.0% | 83.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.9 | 1,213 | 12,818 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.3 | 784 | 12,658 | 50.0% | 85.7% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.1 | 909 | 9,548 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.9 | 1,143 | 11,548 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.7 | 812 | 8,352 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 6.0 | 712 | 8,530 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.2 | 1,121 | 14,042 | 66.7% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.0 | 777 | 10,223 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.8 | 916 | 11,852 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 799 | 6,425 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.2 | 871 | 12,721 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 780 | 11,214 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.3 | 880 | 9,414 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.2 | 1,082 | 11,813 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.3 | 1,000 | 12,924 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.4 | 680 | 10,880 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.3 | 815 | 10,984 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 797 | 10,147 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 820 | 11,105 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 1,090 | 11,446 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 854 | 8,953 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.9 | 1,036 | 10,326 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 1,055 | 10,875 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 986 | 10,887 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 1,333 | 13,011 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Brand wins the Brand vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 52.5% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 47.5%, a 5.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 40 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Brand do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Xin Zhao has the advantage against Brand with a 60.0% win rate versus 40.0%. Xin Zhao players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Brand vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to 40.0%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Brand wins the matchup against Xin Zhao with a 52.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 5.0 percentage point advantage means Brand is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 40 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Xin Zhao?
The best Brand build against Xin Zhao includes Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Brand runes against Xin Zhao use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 37.5% win rate in the Brand vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Xin Zhao?
Yes, Brand has a favorable matchup against Xin Zhao with a 52.5% win rate. Brand strongly counters Xin Zhao in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Brand against Xin Zhao?
When playing Brand against Xin Zhao, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Xin Zhao. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.