
Brandvs Gnar
Brand vs Gnar is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Gnar wins with a 71.4% win rate (+42.9%) over Brand based on 7 games. Gnar wins the early laning phase while Brand scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Brand vs Gnar matchup.
Brand Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Brand performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Brand vs Gnar Matchup?

Brand vs Gnar Matchup Summary
The Brand vs Gnar matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Gnar wins with a 71.4% win rate compared to Brand's 28.6%, giving Gnar a 42.9 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Gnar controls the early laning stage, but Brand outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Gnar needs to press advantages before Brand reaches their power spikes, while Brand should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Gnar leads by 622 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Gnar has a strong advantage in this matchup. Brand players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Gnar overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Brand vs Gnar Laning Phase Breakdown
Gnar is favored during the laning phase against Brand, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Gnar holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Brand Build Against Gnar
Sorcerer's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Gnar, providing the mobility and stats Brand needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Brand against Gnar are Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon and Rylai's Crystal Scepter. This combination gives Brand an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Gnar. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Brand vs Gnar matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Gnar dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 83.3% win rate — a 66.7 percentage point lead over Brand. This lopsided early game means Gnar can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Brand is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Gnar. Extended games heavily favor Brand, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Gnar must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Brand reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Brand survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Brand Runes Against Gnar
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Brand the best tools to compete against Gnar in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Brand matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Brand's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Brand build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 360 | 2.0 | 835 | 9,839 | 55.2% | 46.5% | |
| 48.47% | 326 | 2.7 | 771 | 10,209 | 46.8% | 49.5% | |
| 54.58% | 306 | 6.4 | 1,085 | 12,982 | 58.3% | 52.5% | |
| 52.70% | 241 | 2.6 | 927 | 10,813 | 56.3% | 50.6% | |
| 52.10% | 238 | 1.8 | 882 | 10,186 | 56.7% | 49.3% | |
| 42.99% | 221 | 1.7 | 832 | 9,448 | 41.0% | 44.4% | |
| 54.37% | 206 | 2.1 | 803 | 10,502 | 52.2% | 55.5% | |
| 54.26% | 188 | 5.7 | 994 | 12,239 | 57.4% | 52.5% | |
| 52.72% | 184 | 6.3 | 984 | 12,607 | 53.4% | 52.3% | |
| 52.46% | 183 | 1.8 | 905 | 10,124 | 52.2% | 52.6% | |
| 48.04% | 179 | 1.9 | 867 | 10,359 | 57.6% | 43.3% | |
| 56.41% | 156 | 5.8 | 1,010 | 12,263 | 63.6% | 51.1% | |
| 43.79% | 153 | 3.7 | 847 | 11,070 | 34.6% | 48.5% | |
| 59.59% | 146 | 6.3 | 1,009 | 12,765 | 64.5% | 56.0% | |
| 54.35% | 138 | 6.2 | 1,056 | 12,367 | 53.6% | 54.9% | |
| 46.67% | 135 | 2.9 | 823 | 10,232 | 38.9% | 51.9% | |
| 63.85% | 130 | 2.5 | 1,003 | 10,461 | 64.3% | 63.5% | |
| 55.04% | 129 | 1.9 | 837 | 10,894 | 51.1% | 57.1% | |
| 50.39% | 127 | 5.9 | 994 | 11,268 | 58.3% | 45.6% | |
| 51.20% | 125 | 1.7 | 851 | 9,705 | 63.3% | 43.4% | |
| 47.15% | 123 | 3.6 | 905 | 10,895 | 36.5% | 54.9% | |
| 54.55% | 121 | 1.7 | 838 | 9,328 | 58.5% | 51.5% | |
| 59.66% | 119 | 6.2 | 984 | 12,481 | 59.6% | 59.7% | |
| 48.72% | 117 | 1.9 | 925 | 10,488 | 45.2% | 50.7% | |
| 50.43% | 115 | 2.0 | 847 | 11,294 | 58.8% | 46.9% | |
| 50.00% | 112 | 2.3 | 1,032 | 9,535 | 36.7% | 60.3% | |
| 59.63% | 109 | 1.8 | 865 | 9,886 | 55.8% | 62.1% | |
| 62.96% | 108 | 5.5 | 1,050 | 12,019 | 60.0% | 64.7% | |
| 39.80% | 98 | 6.1 | 936 | 10,348 | 43.4% | 35.6% | |
| 59.79% | 97 | 5.7 | 987 | 11,077 | 59.5% | 60.0% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 2.4 | 892 | 10,242 | 48.7% | 53.6% | |
| 61.05% | 95 | 1.6 | 900 | 10,045 | 75.0% | 49.0% | |
| 60.44% | 91 | 1.6 | 739 | 9,103 | 63.2% | 58.5% | |
| 47.78% | 90 | 1.8 | 890 | 10,485 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 59.09% | 88 | 1.8 | 817 | 10,133 | 64.7% | 55.6% | |
| 48.24% | 85 | 1.9 | 690 | 9,259 | 51.3% | 45.6% | |
| 54.12% | 85 | 6.2 | 1,044 | 13,465 | 58.8% | 51.0% | |
| 51.85% | 81 | 4.6 | 935 | 11,278 | 62.1% | 46.1% | |
| 55.56% | 81 | 6.0 | 1,025 | 12,772 | 65.5% | 50.0% | |
| 52.11% | 71 | 6.2 | 998 | 11,293 | 58.6% | 47.6% | |
| 67.16% | 67 | 6.3 | 1,030 | 13,061 | 78.3% | 61.4% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 4.2 | 925 | 11,615 | 38.1% | 56.5% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 4.8 | 995 | 12,205 | 36.4% | 58.1% | |
| 63.08% | 65 | 4.7 | 1,044 | 11,051 | 62.5% | 63.4% | |
| 57.81% | 64 | 5.7 | 872 | 11,501 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 57.38% | 61 | 5.5 | 876 | 12,308 | 60.9% | 55.3% | |
| 59.02% | 61 | 5.8 | 918 | 10,980 | 65.4% | 54.3% | |
| 53.33% | 60 | 5.6 | 950 | 9,823 | 48.1% | 57.6% | |
| 63.79% | 58 | 5.7 | 1,083 | 12,062 | 68.2% | 61.1% | |
| 42.59% | 54 | 1.9 | 783 | 9,660 | 37.5% | 46.7% | |
| 39.62% | 53 | 5.8 | 995 | 11,354 | 47.8% | 33.3% | |
| 45.28% | 53 | 2.6 | 935 | 12,012 | 50.0% | 42.4% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 1.8 | 896 | 9,989 | 68.4% | 39.4% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 1.9 | 873 | 9,227 | 52.0% | 34.6% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 5.3 | 919 | 9,801 | 52.0% | 56.0% | |
| 60.42% | 48 | 6.0 | 1,003 | 12,385 | 52.9% | 64.5% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 4.2 | 956 | 11,330 | 57.1% | 47.1% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 1.6 | 830 | 9,355 | 42.9% | 57.7% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 1.9 | 877 | 10,359 | 53.3% | 59.4% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 2.2 | 855 | 10,102 | 52.4% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 5.4 | 1,100 | 11,372 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 5.9 | 1,086 | 12,458 | 50.0% | 48.1% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 6.1 | 1,126 | 11,696 | 78.6% | 45.2% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 1.9 | 852 | 12,048 | 43.8% | 51.7% | |
| 65.91% | 44 | 6.4 | 988 | 12,249 | 54.5% | 77.3% | |
| 39.53% | 43 | 5.6 | 915 | 10,746 | 38.9% | 40.0% | |
| 52.38% | 42 | 5.8 | 903 | 11,601 | 41.2% | 60.0% | |
| 35.71% | 42 | 6.0 | 971 | 12,378 | 33.3% | 36.7% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 3.2 | 843 | 10,146 | 26.7% | 53.9% | |
| 63.41% | 41 | 4.0 | 989 | 11,426 | 47.4% | 77.3% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 4.4 | 996 | 11,548 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.2 | 984 | 12,242 | 64.3% | 46.1% | |
| 58.97% | 39 | 5.4 | 851 | 11,887 | 60.0% | 58.3% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 4.6 | 977 | 10,911 | 53.3% | 41.7% | |
| 36.84% | 38 | 4.7 | 1,036 | 12,071 | 25.0% | 42.3% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 6.6 | 970 | 13,122 | 61.5% | 54.2% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 6.1 | 988 | 12,920 | 53.3% | 54.5% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 6.2 | 1,057 | 13,408 | 90.9% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 5.7 | 992 | 10,210 | 63.2% | 35.3% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 6.7 | 1,058 | 11,990 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 1.9 | 879 | 10,646 | 75.0% | 45.0% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 5.7 | 1,027 | 11,365 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 2.4 | 892 | 13,925 | 72.7% | 52.2% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 4.9 | 939 | 10,719 | 27.8% | 43.8% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 3.9 | 891 | 11,053 | 35.7% | 47.4% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 2.1 | 938 | 11,445 | 64.3% | 36.8% | |
| 34.48% | 29 | 5.6 | 972 | 11,848 | 44.4% | 30.0% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 2.3 | 1,024 | 13,384 | 57.1% | 61.9% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 2.9 | 978 | 11,376 | 45.5% | 43.8% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 6.1 | 1,010 | 13,036 | 45.5% | 43.8% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 3.6 | 1,036 | 10,786 | 55.6% | 38.9% | |
| 69.23% | 26 | 1.4 | 927 | 12,916 | 70.0% | 68.8% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 4.7 | 1,236 | 12,420 | 75.0% | 44.4% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 6.7 | 1,136 | 12,927 | 66.7% | 30.0% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 2.0 | 975 | 13,062 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 1.5 | 885 | 11,329 | 62.5% | 52.9% | |
| 68.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 1,079 | 12,669 | 77.8% | 62.5% | |
| 70.83% | 24 | 5.7 | 1,059 | 12,975 | 57.1% | 76.5% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 6.6 | 1,056 | 13,149 | 72.7% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 5.2 | 896 | 12,413 | 40.0% | 58.8% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 2.2 | 894 | 12,058 | 37.5% | 33.3% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 788 | 12,209 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 3.9 | 829 | 11,106 | 44.4% | 54.5% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.3 | 771 | 9,793 | 46.1% | 42.9% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.9 | 1,032 | 12,921 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.2 | 978 | 11,137 | 41.7% | 57.1% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 5.0 | 1,054 | 12,240 | 16.7% | 61.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 3.4 | 927 | 9,728 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 6.3 | 1,132 | 11,667 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 2.0 | 888 | 12,749 | 55.6% | 37.5% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.0 | 1,052 | 12,539 | 50.0% | 27.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.1 | 1,104 | 12,907 | 33.3% | 63.6% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.3 | 972 | 10,182 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.4 | 822 | 12,187 | 57.1% | 30.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.6 | 973 | 11,258 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 892 | 9,959 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.8 | 840 | 10,125 | 28.6% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 5.9 | 1,068 | 11,992 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 6.0 | 1,147 | 12,301 | 42.9% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 5.2 | 942 | 10,499 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.4 | 1,081 | 11,799 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 2.6 | 1,164 | 12,576 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 4.5 | 1,228 | 11,922 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.4 | 1,088 | 11,320 | 75.0% | 54.5% | |
| 0.00% | 14 | 1.0 | 831 | 10,924 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 4.0 | 940 | 10,675 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.4 | 859 | 11,907 | 20.0% | 55.6% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.5 | 831 | 8,827 | 62.5% | 16.7% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 6.2 | 1,039 | 12,238 | 75.0% | 77.8% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.9 | 891 | 12,774 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 4.4 | 952 | 9,026 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.9 | 782 | 9,278 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.6 | 1,048 | 12,314 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.7 | 873 | 10,466 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 2.1 | 934 | 12,544 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.1 | 1,237 | 10,978 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.2 | 1,081 | 12,360 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 1,065 | 9,078 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 898 | 10,316 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 1,129 | 12,489 | 40.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 3.8 | 1,215 | 11,802 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 6.2 | 1,567 | 10,163 | 85.7% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 1,129 | 9,159 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.4 | 1,076 | 11,858 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.7 | 1,157 | 10,879 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.4 | 815 | 8,286 | 28.6% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.6 | 1,115 | 13,289 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 0.9 | 751 | 9,960 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.4 | 1,144 | 15,379 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 1,122 | 8,566 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 936 | 11,574 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.6 | 817 | 8,150 | 16.7% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.3 | 1,258 | 9,074 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.0 | 1,064 | 10,649 | 20.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.9 | 921 | 11,344 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 2.5 | 648 | 5,599 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 786 | 11,432 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.3 | 900 | 11,238 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.6 | 1,157 | 12,218 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.6 | 1,057 | 14,571 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.6 | 1,311 | 11,022 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 700 | 10,595 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 1,260 | 13,763 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 798 | 8,727 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 1,478 | 12,935 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,044 | 13,997 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brand vs Gnar - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Brand do against Gnar in League of Legends?
Gnar wins the Brand vs Gnar matchup with a 71.4% win rate compared to Brand's 28.6%, a 42.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Brand do against Gnar in the early game?
In the early game, Gnar has the advantage against Brand with a 83.3% win rate versus 16.7%. Gnar players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Brand do against Gnar in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Brand vs Gnar matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Brand vs Gnar matchup?
Gnar wins the matchup against Brand with a 71.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 42.9 percentage point advantage means Gnar is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Brand build against Gnar?
The best Brand build against Gnar includes Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon, Rylai's Crystal Scepter with Sorcerer's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Brand runes against Gnar?
The best Brand runes against Gnar use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Brand vs Gnar matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Brand counter Gnar?
No, Brand struggles against Gnar with only a 28.6% win rate. Gnar has the advantage in this matchup. Brand players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Gnar's lead.
How do I play Brand against Gnar?
When playing Brand against Gnar, play cautiously and avoid Gnar's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Gnar in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.