- Avg Place
- 4.01
- 1st Place
- 17.13%
- Top 4 Rate
- 58.45%
Blighting Jewel TFT Team Comps
- Set
- 16
- Matches
- 623,923
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Last Updated
- Oct 13, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Team compositions using Blighting Jewel in TFT Set 16. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Blighting Jewel as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 42 viable team comps currently building Blighting Jewel, with an average win rate of 49.23% across all compositions. The highest performing Blighting Jewel comp achieves a 82.51% win rate, primarily featuring Bruiser, Defender, Invoker traits with Draven as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Blighting Jewel is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.81 | Top 4 82.51% | First Place 28.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.25 | Top 4 77.81% | First Place 17.72% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.24 | Top 4 77.63% | First Place 13.90% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.27 | Top 4 74.37% | First Place 20.49% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.48 | Top 4 73.46% | First Place 11.58% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.44 | Top 4 72.15% | First Place 18.79% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.65 | Top 4 71.87% | First Place 12.23% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 71.47% | First Place 15.11% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.55 | Top 4 70.00% | First Place 13.76% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.66 | Top 4 68.18% | First Place 15.34% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.75 | Top 4 67.17% | First Place 11.88% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.93 | Top 4 61.45% | First Place 10.34% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.09 | Top 4 61.05% | First Place 16.84% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.19 | Top 4 58.18% | First Place 7.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.16 | Top 4 56.10% | First Place 8.87% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.40 | Top 4 54.98% | First Place 8.84% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.50 | Top 4 52.88% | First Place 4.81% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.29 | Top 4 52.62% | First Place 13.67% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.39 | Top 4 52.26% | First Place 5.97% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.47 | Top 4 51.95% | First Place 6.18% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.47 | Top 4 51.03% | First Place 8.04% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.49 | Top 4 50.12% | First Place 6.05% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.59 | Top 4 45.65% | First Place 4.88% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.73 | Top 4 43.79% | First Place 7.33% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.89 | Top 4 43.08% | First Place 6.75% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.13 | Top 4 39.70% | First Place 2.58% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.19 | Top 4 37.04% | First Place 3.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.13 | Top 4 36.93% | First Place 4.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.14 | Top 4 36.24% | First Place 5.00% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.25 | Top 4 36.17% | First Place 3.03% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.21 | Top 4 35.98% | First Place 4.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.25 | Top 4 35.47% | First Place 3.57% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.14 | Top 4 35.13% | First Place 2.22% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.19 | Top 4 34.17% | First Place 5.38% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.39 | Top 4 31.50% | First Place 5.05% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.64 | Top 4 26.97% | First Place 2.65% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.59 | Top 4 26.72% | First Place 1.72% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.65 | Top 4 25.42% | First Place 1.13% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.73 | Top 4 25.34% | First Place 0.55% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.65 | Top 4 23.32% | First Place 1.85% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.94 | Top 4 21.08% | First Place 0.97% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.92 | Top 4 18.91% | First Place 2.99% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Blighting Jewel Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Blighting Jewel in TFT Set 16?
The best team comp featuring Blighting Jewel in TFT Set 16 achieves a 82.51% win rate with a 0.07% pick rate. This composition uses Bruiser, Defender, and Invoker traits and is picked in 0.07% of games featuring Blighting Jewel.
How many team comps use Blighting Jewel in TFT?
There are 42 viable team compositions that commonly build Blighting Jewel in TFT Set 16. Blighting Jewel appears in comps with an average win rate of 49.23% across 55,211 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Blighting Jewel most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Blighting Jewel in TFT Set 16 uses the Defender, Disruptor, and Piltover traits with a 1.22% pick rate. This composition achieves a 74.37% win rate and average placement of 3.27.
What traits work well with Blighting Jewel in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Blighting Jewel in TFT Set 16 are Bruiser, Defender, Invoker, Eternal, Noxus, Quickstriker, and Arcanist. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Blighting Jewel team compositions.