
Needlessly Large RodTFT Team Comps
Team compositions using Needlessly Large Rod in TFT Set 16.4. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Needlessly Large Rod as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 53 viable team comps currently building Needlessly Large Rod, with an average win rate of 48.37% across all compositions. The highest performing Needlessly Large Rod comp achieves a 88.24% win rate, primarily featuring Bruiser, Caretaker, Targon traits with Bard as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Needlessly Large Rod is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
2.87 Avg Place | 88.24% Win Rate | 22.06% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
2.58 Avg Place | 87.05% Win Rate | 25.90% First Place | 0.15% Pick Rate | |||||
3.16 Avg Place | 80.04% Win Rate | 19.55% First Place | 0.53% Pick Rate | |||||
2.95 Avg Place | 79.46% Win Rate | 26.49% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | |||||
3.02 Avg Place | 79.15% Win Rate | 23.99% First Place | 0.59% Pick Rate | |||||
2.95 Avg Place | 78.45% Win Rate | 27.59% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | |||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.37% Win Rate | 15.75% First Place | 0.32% Pick Rate | |||||
3.65 Avg Place | 73.24% Win Rate | 19.72% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
3.43 Avg Place | 71.67% Win Rate | 20.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
3.56 Avg Place | 70.74% Win Rate | 15.93% First Place | 0.29% Pick Rate | |||||
3.68 Avg Place | 69.95% Win Rate | 11.40% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | |||||
3.62 Avg Place | 68.09% Win Rate | 10.64% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.17 Avg Place | 62.07% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
3.92 Avg Place | 59.06% Win Rate | 14.04% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | |||||
4.28 Avg Place | 58.23% Win Rate | 8.23% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | |||||
4.20 Avg Place | 52.14% Win Rate | 17.09% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | |||||
4.18 Avg Place | 52.00% Win Rate | 18.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.48 Avg Place | 51.58% Win Rate | 5.26% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | |||||
4.35 Avg Place | 51.06% Win Rate | 13.83% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | |||||
4.25 Avg Place | 50.91% Win Rate | 9.09% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.44 Avg Place | 50.55% Win Rate | 8.79% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | |||||
4.52 Avg Place | 50.00% Win Rate | 13.04% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.54 Avg Place | 48.72% Win Rate | 7.18% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | |||||
4.40 Avg Place | 48.33% Win Rate | 15.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
4.95 Avg Place | 47.50% Win Rate | 2.50% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.78 Avg Place | 46.27% Win Rate | 3.73% First Place | 0.35% Pick Rate | |||||
4.52 Avg Place | 46.18% Win Rate | 14.37% First Place | 0.36% Pick Rate | |||||
4.33 Avg Place | 46.15% Win Rate | 3.85% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.64 Avg Place | 46.12% Win Rate | 8.19% First Place | 0.25% Pick Rate | |||||
4.65 Avg Place | 45.35% Win Rate | 8.14% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.83 Avg Place | 43.41% Win Rate | 5.85% First Place | 0.22% Pick Rate | |||||
- | 4.91 Avg Place | 42.67% Win Rate | 7.41% First Place | 2.06% Pick Rate | ||||
4.76 Avg Place | 41.84% Win Rate | 6.12% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | |||||
4.46 Avg Place | 41.79% Win Rate | 12.69% First Place | 0.15% Pick Rate | |||||
4.69 Avg Place | 41.51% Win Rate | 6.60% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
5.15 Avg Place | 40.57% Win Rate | 1.42% First Place | 0.23% Pick Rate | |||||
5.11 Avg Place | 37.04% Win Rate | 1.85% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.26 Avg Place | 35.72% Win Rate | 5.71% First Place | 0.90% Pick Rate | |||||
4.87 Avg Place | 35.19% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.01 Avg Place | 34.82% Win Rate | 4.46% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
5.22 Avg Place | 34.21% Win Rate | 2.19% First Place | 0.25% Pick Rate | |||||
5.27 Avg Place | 34.11% Win Rate | 0.78% First Place | 0.14% Pick Rate | |||||
5.24 Avg Place | 32.35% Win Rate | 8.82% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
5.23 Avg Place | 30.81% Win Rate | 4.07% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | |||||
5.22 Avg Place | 30.43% Win Rate | 8.70% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.51 Avg Place | 28.30% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.52 Avg Place | 24.84% Win Rate | 3.27% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | |||||
5.64 Avg Place | 24.14% Win Rate | 3.45% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.45 Avg Place | 23.44% Win Rate | 4.69% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
5.69 Avg Place | 22.99% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
5.99 Avg Place | 18.07% Win Rate | 3.01% First Place | 0.18% Pick Rate | |||||
6.04 Avg Place | 16.98% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
6.57 Avg Place | 13.85% Win Rate | 1.54% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Needlessly Large Rod Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Needlessly Large Rod in TFT Set 16?
The best team comp featuring Needlessly Large Rod in TFT Set 16 achieves a 88.24% win rate with a 0.07% pick rate. This composition uses Bruiser, Caretaker, and Targon traits and is picked in 0.07% of games featuring Needlessly Large Rod.
How many team comps use Needlessly Large Rod in TFT?
There are 53 viable team compositions that commonly build Needlessly Large Rod in TFT Set 16. Needlessly Large Rod appears in comps with an average win rate of 48.37% across 9,981 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Needlessly Large Rod most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Needlessly Large Rod in TFT Set 16 uses the Defender and Yordle traits with a 2.06% pick rate. This composition achieves a 42.67% win rate and average placement of 4.91.
What comp with Needlessly Large Rod has the best average placement?
The Needlessly Large Rod comp with the best average placement achieves 2.58 with the Caretaker, Defender, and Huntress traits. This composition has a 87.05% win rate and 0.15% pick rate.
What traits work well with Needlessly Large Rod in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Needlessly Large Rod in TFT Set 16 are Bruiser, Caretaker, and Targon. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Needlessly Large Rod team compositions.