
QuicksilverTFT Team Comps
Team compositions using Quicksilver in TFT Set 16.6. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Quicksilver as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 46 viable team comps currently building Quicksilver, with an average win rate of 50.52% across all compositions. The highest performing Quicksilver comp achieves a 81.03% win rate, primarily featuring Caretaker, Defender, Huntress traits with Neeko as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Quicksilver is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
3.00 Avg Place | 81.03% Win Rate | 17.24% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | |||||
2.86 Avg Place | 78.26% Win Rate | 31.88% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
3.19 Avg Place | 77.58% Win Rate | 15.21% First Place | 0.34% Pick Rate | |||||
3.43 Avg Place | 75.00% Win Rate | 22.06% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
3.40 Avg Place | 73.59% Win Rate | 14.91% First Place | 0.36% Pick Rate | |||||
3.39 Avg Place | 72.90% Win Rate | 15.89% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
3.33 Avg Place | 72.89% Win Rate | 20.66% First Place | 1.74% Pick Rate | |||||
3.66 Avg Place | 71.90% Win Rate | 10.74% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate | |||||
3.36 Avg Place | 71.51% Win Rate | 17.60% First Place | 0.63% Pick Rate | |||||
3.38 Avg Place | 69.84% Win Rate | 14.29% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
3.46 Avg Place | 69.49% Win Rate | 25.42% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
3.76 Avg Place | 69.05% Win Rate | 14.29% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
3.53 Avg Place | 68.97% Win Rate | 15.52% First Place | 0.15% Pick Rate | |||||
3.66 Avg Place | 67.95% Win Rate | 15.33% First Place | 0.89% Pick Rate | |||||
3.66 Avg Place | 67.68% Win Rate | 10.10% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.00 Avg Place | 62.12% Win Rate | 3.03% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
4.21 Avg Place | 60.92% Win Rate | 4.60% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
3.94 Avg Place | 59.49% Win Rate | 11.39% First Place | 0.14% Pick Rate | |||||
4.10 Avg Place | 58.41% Win Rate | 12.15% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | |||||
4.43 Avg Place | 54.72% Win Rate | 6.60% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.55 Avg Place | 54.29% Win Rate | 7.62% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.28 Avg Place | 51.82% Win Rate | 8.76% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | |||||
4.68 Avg Place | 49.52% Win Rate | 3.81% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.66 Avg Place | 47.54% Win Rate | 11.48% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
4.57 Avg Place | 45.41% Win Rate | 8.11% First Place | 0.16% Pick Rate | |||||
4.86 Avg Place | 45.32% Win Rate | 6.04% First Place | 0.29% Pick Rate | |||||
4.86 Avg Place | 43.43% Win Rate | 4.04% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | |||||
4.79 Avg Place | 43.25% Win Rate | 6.34% First Place | 0.32% Pick Rate | |||||
4.93 Avg Place | 42.06% Win Rate | 2.80% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
4.78 Avg Place | 41.75% Win Rate | 5.83% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
5.08 Avg Place | 40.54% Win Rate | 6.76% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
- | 5.06 Avg Place | 39.69% Win Rate | 6.58% First Place | 0.90% Pick Rate | ||||
- | 5.24 Avg Place | 37.28% Win Rate | 4.66% First Place | 0.25% Pick Rate | ||||
5.32 Avg Place | 35.71% Win Rate | 6.12% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | |||||
5.12 Avg Place | 33.90% Win Rate | 5.08% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | |||||
5.23 Avg Place | 33.15% Win Rate | 5.43% First Place | 0.16% Pick Rate | |||||
5.29 Avg Place | 32.64% Win Rate | 5.18% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | |||||
5.31 Avg Place | 31.76% Win Rate | 4.71% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | |||||
5.43 Avg Place | 30.52% Win Rate | 5.14% First Place | 0.91% Pick Rate | |||||
5.39 Avg Place | 29.89% Win Rate | 5.98% First Place | 0.16% Pick Rate | |||||
- | 5.67 Avg Place | 26.76% Win Rate | 3.24% First Place | 0.33% Pick Rate | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 24.64% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
5.54 Avg Place | 20.99% Win Rate | 2.47% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | |||||
5.67 Avg Place | 20.86% Win Rate | 1.84% First Place | 0.14% Pick Rate | |||||
5.64 Avg Place | 20.31% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | |||||
6.08 Avg Place | 17.50% Win Rate | 0.83% First Place | 0.11% Pick Rate |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Quicksilver Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Quicksilver in TFT Set 16?
The best team comp featuring Quicksilver in TFT Set 16 achieves a 81.03% win rate with a 0.10% pick rate. This composition uses Caretaker, Defender, and Huntress traits and is picked in 0.10% of games featuring Quicksilver.
How many team comps use Quicksilver in TFT?
There are 46 viable team compositions that commonly build Quicksilver in TFT Set 16. Quicksilver appears in comps with an average win rate of 50.52% across 11,853 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Quicksilver most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Quicksilver in TFT Set 16 uses the Defender, Disruptor, and Piltover traits with a 1.74% pick rate. This composition achieves a 72.89% win rate and average placement of 3.33.
What comp with Quicksilver has the best average placement?
The Quicksilver comp with the best average placement achieves 2.86 with the Bruiser, Defender, and Invoker traits. This composition has a 78.26% win rate and 0.06% pick rate.
What traits work well with Quicksilver in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Quicksilver in TFT Set 16 are Caretaker, Defender, Huntress, Juggernaut, Piltover, Dragonborn, Arcanist, and Targon. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Quicksilver team compositions.
Sparring Gloves
Negatron Cloak