Seraphinevs Xin Zhao
Seraphine vs Xin Zhao is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Seraphine wins with a 71.4% win rate (+42.9%) over Xin Zhao based on 7 games. Xin Zhao wins the early laning phase while Seraphine scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Seraphine vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Seraphine Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Seraphine performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Xin Zhao(71.4%)Who Wins the Seraphine vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Seraphine vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Seraphine vs Xin Zhao matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Seraphine wins with a 71.4% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 28.6%, giving Seraphine a 42.9 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Xin Zhao controls the early laning stage, but Seraphine outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Xin Zhao needs to press advantages before Seraphine reaches their power spikes, while Seraphine should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Xin Zhao leads by 831 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Seraphine players can confidently pick into Xin Zhao and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Xin Zhao away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Seraphine vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Seraphine, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Seraphine Build Against Xin Zhao
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Seraphine needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Seraphine against Xin Zhao are Liandry's Torment, Stormsurge and Blackfire Torch. This combination gives Seraphine an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Seraphine vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Seraphine0.0%Xin Zhao100.0%Seraphine83.3%Xin Zhao16.7%Xin Zhao dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Seraphine. This lopsided early game means Xin Zhao can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Seraphine is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 83.3% win rate — 66.7 points above Xin Zhao. Extended games heavily favor Seraphine, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Xin Zhao must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Seraphine reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Seraphine survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Seraphine Runes Against Xin Zhao
Sorcery
Precision
Running Sorcery primary with Precision secondary allows Seraphine to press their advantage against Xin Zhao, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Seraphine matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Seraphine's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.60% | 584 | 1.6 | 451 | 9,371 | 49.4% | 56.4% | |
| 49.36% | 468 | 1.4 | 467 | 8,815 | 46.5% | 51.8% | |
| 54.23% | 426 | 1.4 | 476 | 9,061 | 56.5% | 52.5% | |
| 51.42% | 387 | 1.6 | 507 | 9,109 | 59.9% | 45.6% | |
| 48.77% | 324 | 1.7 | 510 | 9,350 | 43.9% | 52.1% | |
| 50.47% | 321 | 1.5 | 438 | 8,767 | 49.3% | 51.4% | |
| 61.29% | 310 | 1.4 | 502 | 8,875 | 63.2% | 59.5% | |
| 51.30% | 269 | 1.4 | 492 | 8,835 | 53.6% | 49.7% | |
| 55.22% | 268 | 1.4 | 459 | 8,141 | 64.0% | 46.2% | |
| 47.55% | 265 | 1.3 | 487 | 8,808 | 49.6% | 45.7% | |
| 51.00% | 251 | 1.4 | 437 | 8,929 | 55.1% | 48.4% | |
| 57.32% | 239 | 1.4 | 489 | 9,516 | 55.3% | 59.2% | |
| 55.04% | 238 | 1.4 | 483 | 9,535 | 47.0% | 60.9% | |
| 54.63% | 216 | 1.6 | 489 | 9,564 | 57.9% | 52.9% | |
| 47.55% | 204 | 1.3 | 431 | 8,656 | 42.2% | 51.8% | |
| 47.42% | 194 | 1.6 | 439 | 9,307 | 34.2% | 55.9% | |
| 50.85% | 177 | 1.6 | 553 | 9,299 | 48.6% | 52.4% | |
| 56.82% | 176 | 1.5 | 383 | 8,580 | 59.1% | 54.5% | |
| 54.82% | 166 | 1.3 | 457 | 8,549 | 58.5% | 51.2% | |
| 46.63% | 163 | 1.4 | 483 | 8,906 | 50.7% | 43.3% | |
| 56.60% | 159 | 1.4 | 572 | 9,273 | 58.2% | 55.4% | |
| 51.61% | 155 | 1.6 | 457 | 9,587 | 53.7% | 50.5% | |
| 44.81% | 154 | 1.3 | 455 | 8,948 | 53.0% | 38.6% | |
| 56.08% | 148 | 1.4 | 501 | 8,900 | 60.3% | 52.5% | |
| 60.96% | 146 | 1.7 | 467 | 9,564 | 43.1% | 70.5% | |
| 54.24% | 118 | 1.3 | 445 | 9,091 | 47.1% | 59.7% | |
| 58.93% | 112 | 1.4 | 466 | 9,046 | 57.1% | 60.3% | |
| 55.24% | 105 | 4.5 | 673 | 11,533 | 54.8% | 55.6% | |
| 52.04% | 98 | 1.3 | 447 | 8,947 | 53.3% | 50.9% | |
| 47.87% | 94 | 1.4 | 454 | 8,828 | 56.1% | 41.5% | |
| 43.62% | 94 | 1.5 | 524 | 8,979 | 46.1% | 41.8% | |
| 53.76% | 93 | 1.3 | 508 | 9,091 | 54.8% | 52.9% | |
| 46.74% | 92 | 6.4 | 824 | 12,641 | 55.6% | 41.1% | |
| 48.05% | 77 | 1.4 | 442 | 8,549 | 60.5% | 35.9% | |
| 54.67% | 75 | 6.2 | 771 | 12,232 | 58.6% | 52.2% | |
| 48.39% | 62 | 1.8 | 514 | 9,606 | 57.7% | 41.7% | |
| 52.63% | 57 | 1.4 | 461 | 9,488 | 60.7% | 44.8% | |
| 41.07% | 56 | 4.1 | 694 | 11,175 | 52.0% | 32.3% | |
| 54.90% | 51 | 1.5 | 451 | 8,649 | 52.0% | 57.7% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 1.6 | 554 | 9,635 | 66.7% | 46.9% | |
| 68.75% | 48 | 5.8 | 731 | 12,600 | 79.0% | 62.1% | |
| 58.70% | 46 | 2.8 | 595 | 9,493 | 66.7% | 53.6% | |
| 60.00% | 45 | 1.3 | 532 | 9,728 | 66.7% | 54.2% | |
| 65.12% | 43 | 1.4 | 448 | 8,485 | 70.0% | 60.9% | |
| 40.00% | 40 | 6.2 | 733 | 11,272 | 29.4% | 47.8% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 2.0 | 473 | 9,748 | 35.3% | 61.1% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 1.7 | 555 | 10,069 | 63.6% | 45.8% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 1.6 | 481 | 9,633 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 1.8 | 422 | 8,380 | 66.7% | 52.9% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.1 | 790 | 13,272 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 4.6 | 569 | 8,566 | 82.3% | 28.6% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 1.3 | 416 | 9,022 | 30.0% | 52.6% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 4.3 | 545 | 9,325 | 46.7% | 41.7% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 2.9 | 556 | 9,692 | 60.0% | 47.1% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 1.4 | 532 | 9,612 | 20.0% | 69.2% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.1 | 511 | 10,828 | 57.1% | 46.7% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 3.6 | 662 | 11,451 | 45.5% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 747 | 12,309 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 440 | 9,371 | 44.4% | 72.7% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 2.4 | 500 | 9,152 | 70.0% | 55.6% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.7 | 614 | 10,995 | 25.0% | 46.7% | |
| 26.32% | 19 | 5.5 | 589 | 9,004 | 25.0% | 27.3% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.6 | 500 | 9,284 | 50.0% | 30.8% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.1 | 740 | 11,852 | 44.4% | 44.4% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 5.7 | 790 | 12,585 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.4 | 470 | 10,261 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.5 | 887 | 12,571 | 83.3% | 55.6% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.3 | 848 | 14,027 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 2.3 | 632 | 8,628 | 57.1% | 75.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 4.3 | 766 | 10,100 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 7.1 | 941 | 12,930 | 44.4% | 75.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.1 | 874 | 12,134 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 3.8 | 623 | 11,812 | 0.0% | 27.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.4 | 543 | 8,195 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.2 | 771 | 11,146 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.8 | 859 | 12,250 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.9 | 497 | 10,253 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 2.9 | 623 | 11,070 | 33.3% | 55.6% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.9 | 531 | 9,657 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.4 | 521 | 9,284 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 5.4 | 663 | 11,267 | 66.7% | 87.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.8 | 604 | 8,696 | 28.6% | 100.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.8 | 490 | 8,504 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 716 | 13,210 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 595 | 9,472 | 80.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.2 | 541 | 9,433 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.2 | 472 | 9,944 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.2 | 400 | 6,192 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 5.1 | 794 | 10,926 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.5 | 733 | 10,772 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.2 | 816 | 10,822 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.2 | 689 | 10,420 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.4 | 546 | 9,148 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.6 | 800 | 12,149 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.0 | 453 | 8,169 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 7.4 | 796 | 15,676 | 100.0% | 71.4% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.9 | 552 | 11,372 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 730 | 10,122 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 3.3 | 566 | 7,942 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 683 | 11,394 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.0 | 687 | 11,791 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.4 | 525 | 11,881 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.2 | 508 | 10,147 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.0 | 321 | 7,243 | 20.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.7 | 735 | 11,625 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.4 | 458 | 8,678 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.9 | 763 | 10,482 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.0 | 815 | 10,376 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.2 | 523 | 8,768 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.0 | 689 | 10,171 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.9 | 718 | 12,364 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.5 | 440 | 9,938 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 516 | 8,455 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 1,012 | 14,547 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 455 | 9,558 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 393 | 8,395 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 577 | 9,260 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 541 | 10,197 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 720 | 9,534 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 559 | 8,181 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 726 | 9,116 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 552 | 9,213 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Seraphine vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Seraphine do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Seraphine wins the Seraphine vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 71.4% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 28.6%, a 42.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Seraphine do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Xin Zhao has the advantage against Seraphine with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Xin Zhao players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Seraphine do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Seraphine takes over the Seraphine vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 83.3% win rate compared to 16.7%. Seraphine scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Seraphine vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Seraphine wins the matchup against Xin Zhao with a 71.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 42.9 percentage point advantage means Seraphine is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Seraphine build against Xin Zhao?
The best Seraphine build against Xin Zhao includes Liandry's Torment, Stormsurge, Blackfire Torch with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Seraphine runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Seraphine runes against Xin Zhao use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Seraphine vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Seraphine counter Xin Zhao?
Yes, Seraphine has a favorable matchup against Xin Zhao with a 71.4% win rate. Seraphine strongly counters Xin Zhao in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Seraphine against Xin Zhao?
When playing Seraphine against Xin Zhao, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Xin Zhao. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.