Seraphinevs Olaf
Seraphine vs Olaf is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Seraphine wins with a 57.1% win rate (+14.3%) over Olaf based on 7 games. Seraphine wins the early laning phase while Olaf scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Seraphine vs Olaf matchup.
Seraphine Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Seraphine performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Olaf(57.1%)Who Wins the Seraphine vs Olaf Matchup?
Seraphine vs Olaf Matchup Summary
The Seraphine vs Olaf matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Seraphine wins with a 57.1% win rate compared to Olaf's 42.9%, giving Seraphine a 14.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Seraphine controls the early laning stage, but Olaf outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Seraphine needs to press advantages before Olaf reaches their power spikes, while Olaf should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Olaf leads by 549 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Seraphine players can confidently pick into Olaf and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Olaf away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Seraphine vs Olaf Laning Phase Breakdown
Olaf is favored during the laning phase against Seraphine, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Olaf holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Seraphine Build Against Olaf
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Olaf, providing the mobility and stats Seraphine needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Seraphine against Olaf are Echoes of Helia, Morellonomicon and Diadem of Songs. This combination gives Seraphine an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Olaf. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Seraphine vs Olaf matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Seraphine75.0%Olaf25.0%Seraphine33.3%Olaf66.7%Seraphine dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 75.0% win rate — a 50.0 percentage point lead over Olaf. This lopsided early game means Seraphine can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Olaf is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Seraphine. Extended games heavily favor Olaf, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Seraphine must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Olaf reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Olaf survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Seraphine Runes Against Olaf
Sorcery
Resolve
Running Sorcery primary with Resolve secondary allows Seraphine to press their advantage against Olaf, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Seraphine matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Seraphine's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.02% | 1,029 | 1.5 | 454 | 9,509 | 46.0% | 54.3% | |
| 48.44% | 867 | 1.4 | 462 | 8,799 | 49.3% | 47.8% | |
| 47.60% | 687 | 1.6 | 510 | 9,287 | 51.0% | 45.0% | |
| 51.59% | 628 | 1.4 | 483 | 9,178 | 53.8% | 49.9% | |
| 56.01% | 607 | 1.4 | 497 | 9,138 | 60.3% | 52.1% | |
| 53.23% | 541 | 1.5 | 457 | 9,173 | 53.9% | 52.7% | |
| 51.03% | 486 | 1.4 | 499 | 9,251 | 54.0% | 48.5% | |
| 50.32% | 469 | 1.7 | 495 | 9,496 | 44.4% | 54.6% | |
| 48.14% | 457 | 1.4 | 432 | 8,813 | 50.5% | 46.4% | |
| 50.11% | 449 | 1.4 | 470 | 8,490 | 49.6% | 50.7% | |
| 50.72% | 416 | 1.5 | 469 | 9,312 | 47.4% | 53.6% | |
| 58.60% | 413 | 1.4 | 497 | 9,146 | 57.6% | 59.4% | |
| 45.01% | 391 | 1.5 | 501 | 8,950 | 45.4% | 44.8% | |
| 52.56% | 352 | 1.5 | 474 | 9,121 | 46.4% | 56.6% | |
| 52.89% | 329 | 1.4 | 457 | 9,065 | 52.5% | 53.3% | |
| 52.74% | 328 | 1.4 | 376 | 8,715 | 59.1% | 47.1% | |
| 44.90% | 314 | 1.5 | 458 | 8,898 | 43.6% | 46.0% | |
| 53.99% | 313 | 1.3 | 433 | 9,014 | 59.4% | 50.3% | |
| 55.21% | 288 | 1.4 | 490 | 9,696 | 58.0% | 53.4% | |
| 52.82% | 284 | 1.7 | 548 | 9,175 | 55.4% | 50.6% | |
| 51.28% | 273 | 1.4 | 520 | 9,120 | 54.7% | 48.3% | |
| 55.06% | 267 | 1.4 | 592 | 8,974 | 60.0% | 51.6% | |
| 59.85% | 259 | 1.7 | 492 | 9,438 | 57.9% | 61.4% | |
| 50.78% | 258 | 1.6 | 464 | 9,391 | 50.5% | 50.9% | |
| 53.41% | 249 | 1.5 | 506 | 9,326 | 51.9% | 54.6% | |
| 60.66% | 183 | 4.0 | 607 | 10,892 | 58.8% | 62.1% | |
| 62.78% | 180 | 1.4 | 503 | 9,024 | 64.0% | 61.7% | |
| 50.84% | 179 | 1.4 | 472 | 9,112 | 62.0% | 43.5% | |
| 59.88% | 167 | 1.4 | 488 | 9,197 | 66.2% | 54.8% | |
| 49.66% | 147 | 1.4 | 446 | 9,092 | 56.1% | 44.4% | |
| 52.74% | 146 | 1.5 | 500 | 9,046 | 53.5% | 52.0% | |
| 54.89% | 133 | 1.4 | 503 | 9,042 | 46.0% | 62.9% | |
| 50.00% | 128 | 1.3 | 515 | 9,387 | 48.9% | 50.6% | |
| 52.94% | 119 | 1.5 | 488 | 9,702 | 54.9% | 51.5% | |
| 46.02% | 113 | 6.4 | 851 | 11,841 | 50.0% | 43.5% | |
| 44.04% | 109 | 1.4 | 479 | 8,965 | 42.3% | 45.6% | |
| 39.22% | 102 | 1.8 | 482 | 9,326 | 36.6% | 41.0% | |
| 48.98% | 98 | 6.3 | 830 | 12,505 | 48.9% | 49.1% | |
| 56.38% | 94 | 5.2 | 747 | 12,007 | 51.5% | 59.0% | |
| 52.87% | 87 | 4.2 | 722 | 11,130 | 66.7% | 43.1% | |
| 48.78% | 82 | 1.4 | 516 | 8,665 | 54.8% | 42.5% | |
| 51.25% | 80 | 1.4 | 474 | 9,266 | 52.9% | 50.0% | |
| 52.56% | 78 | 3.2 | 590 | 10,392 | 57.1% | 48.8% | |
| 44.44% | 72 | 1.8 | 564 | 8,732 | 42.9% | 46.0% | |
| 51.43% | 70 | 1.9 | 464 | 9,941 | 61.5% | 45.5% | |
| 47.06% | 68 | 1.8 | 544 | 9,787 | 37.5% | 52.3% | |
| 55.38% | 65 | 1.5 | 557 | 9,654 | 54.5% | 55.8% | |
| 59.38% | 64 | 5.5 | 782 | 13,091 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 51.72% | 58 | 2.5 | 515 | 9,285 | 40.7% | 61.3% | |
| 60.78% | 51 | 6.6 | 789 | 12,054 | 72.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.78% | 49 | 4.5 | 728 | 12,661 | 45.0% | 34.5% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.6 | 421 | 9,274 | 52.6% | 53.3% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 4.5 | 764 | 11,744 | 33.3% | 55.9% | |
| 58.70% | 46 | 2.3 | 471 | 9,870 | 59.1% | 58.3% | |
| 67.44% | 43 | 4.2 | 623 | 10,990 | 53.3% | 75.0% | |
| 37.84% | 37 | 6.4 | 780 | 12,048 | 42.9% | 34.8% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 4.8 | 591 | 10,109 | 52.4% | 50.0% | |
| 37.84% | 37 | 2.3 | 490 | 9,869 | 41.2% | 35.0% | |
| 68.57% | 35 | 1.4 | 437 | 10,448 | 76.9% | 63.6% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 2.3 | 705 | 9,449 | 33.3% | 58.8% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 1.7 | 539 | 10,885 | 60.0% | 31.0% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 1.2 | 442 | 9,637 | 46.7% | 68.4% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 6.2 | 837 | 12,248 | 57.9% | 66.7% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 1.9 | 628 | 9,332 | 60.0% | 46.7% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 6.2 | 865 | 12,573 | 72.7% | 55.6% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 2.8 | 531 | 10,259 | 54.5% | 58.8% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.5 | 489 | 9,431 | 41.7% | 43.8% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 1.6 | 490 | 9,255 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 67.86% | 28 | 6.7 | 889 | 13,310 | 80.0% | 61.1% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 4.4 | 638 | 10,038 | 30.0% | 68.8% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 738 | 10,674 | 58.3% | 53.9% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 5.3 | 767 | 11,359 | 75.0% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.3 | 763 | 11,633 | 53.9% | 45.5% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 4.0 | 490 | 9,807 | 63.6% | 33.3% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.2 | 891 | 12,221 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 4.5 | 777 | 10,371 | 44.4% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.3 | 496 | 10,189 | 66.7% | 43.8% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.0 | 635 | 9,440 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 5.4 | 797 | 11,561 | 33.3% | 41.7% | |
| 76.19% | 21 | 1.3 | 507 | 10,120 | 57.1% | 85.7% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.6 | 450 | 8,327 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 3.4 | 528 | 8,684 | 76.9% | 50.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.9 | 581 | 8,652 | 45.5% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.3 | 521 | 10,285 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.9 | 750 | 10,326 | 60.0% | 41.7% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 4.3 | 767 | 11,464 | 100.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.2 | 476 | 9,557 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 4.2 | 686 | 8,730 | 62.5% | 71.4% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 2.8 | 530 | 9,614 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 2.2 | 695 | 11,338 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.2 | 523 | 9,776 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.3 | 794 | 12,130 | 62.5% | 16.7% | |
| 85.71% | 14 | 3.9 | 637 | 11,482 | 80.0% | 88.9% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 2.4 | 504 | 9,953 | 77.8% | 60.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 3.8 | 718 | 11,984 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.9 | 904 | 11,564 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 4.2 | 703 | 10,672 | 33.3% | 85.7% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 6.7 | 831 | 12,812 | 83.3% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.9 | 727 | 12,338 | 80.0% | 28.6% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 6.4 | 794 | 14,429 | 60.0% | 85.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.9 | 653 | 11,092 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.0 | 852 | 12,177 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 2.9 | 577 | 10,783 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.4 | 505 | 8,783 | 16.7% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.2 | 587 | 9,824 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.3 | 725 | 12,114 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.5 | 793 | 10,751 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.6 | 612 | 8,991 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.2 | 648 | 11,627 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.3 | 368 | 8,944 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 5.3 | 727 | 12,287 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.3 | 592 | 9,989 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.3 | 406 | 8,790 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.8 | 695 | 10,814 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.1 | 534 | 8,750 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.3 | 688 | 11,111 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.5 | 456 | 10,838 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.8 | 750 | 10,706 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.0 | 525 | 11,282 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.6 | 472 | 11,380 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.0 | 656 | 8,950 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 634 | 11,340 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.7 | 577 | 9,286 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.8 | 433 | 11,047 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.4 | 783 | 9,449 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 434 | 9,369 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 874 | 8,938 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 570 | 10,558 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 855 | 10,957 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 549 | 9,351 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 542 | 9,889 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 583 | 11,240 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.4 | 731 | 8,281 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 432 | 11,566 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Seraphine vs Olaf - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Seraphine do against Olaf in League of Legends?
Seraphine wins the Seraphine vs Olaf matchup with a 57.1% win rate compared to Olaf's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Seraphine do against Olaf in the early game?
In the early game, Seraphine has the advantage against Olaf with a 75.0% win rate versus 25.0%. Seraphine players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Seraphine do against Olaf in the late game?
In the late game, Olaf takes over the Seraphine vs Olaf matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Olaf scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Seraphine vs Olaf matchup?
Seraphine wins the matchup against Olaf with a 57.1% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 14.3 percentage point advantage means Seraphine is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Seraphine build against Olaf?
The best Seraphine build against Olaf includes Echoes of Helia, Morellonomicon, Diadem of Songs with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Seraphine runes against Olaf?
The best Seraphine runes against Olaf use the Sorcery primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Seraphine vs Olaf matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Seraphine counter Olaf?
Yes, Seraphine has a favorable matchup against Olaf with a 57.1% win rate. Seraphine strongly counters Olaf in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Seraphine against Olaf?
When playing Seraphine against Olaf, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.