Seraphinevs Cassiopeia
Seraphine vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.14. Cassiopeia wins with a 77.8% win rate (+55.6%) over Seraphine based on 9 games. Cassiopeia holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Seraphine vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Seraphine Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Seraphine performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Seraphine vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Seraphine vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Seraphine vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 9 recent matches analyzed, Cassiopeia wins with a 77.8% win rate compared to Seraphine's 22.2%, giving Cassiopeia a 55.6 percentage point advantage. Cassiopeia dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Seraphine players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Cassiopeia leads by 324 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Cassiopeia has a strong advantage in this matchup. Seraphine players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Cassiopeia overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Seraphine vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Seraphine, winning 5 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Seraphine Build Against Cassiopeia
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Seraphine needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Seraphine against Cassiopeia are Luden's Echo, Stormsurge and Imperial Mandate. This combination gives Seraphine an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Seraphine vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Seraphine0.0%
Cassiopeia100.0%Seraphine28.6%Cassiopeia71.4%Cassiopeia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Seraphine. This lopsided early game means Cassiopeia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Cassiopeia is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 71.4% win rate — 42.9 points above Seraphine. Extended games heavily favor Cassiopeia, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Cassiopeia holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Seraphine players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Seraphine Runes Against Cassiopeia
Sorcery
Inspiration
The Sorcery and Inspiration rune setup gives Seraphine the best tools to compete against Cassiopeia in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Seraphine matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.14. The table below shows Seraphine's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.16% | 711 | 1.7 | 481 | 9,367 | 51.5% | 54.1% | |
| 51.75% | 429 | 1.5 | 510 | 8,833 | 57.1% | 48.3% | |
| 54.52% | 398 | 1.5 | 503 | 9,133 | 50.3% | 57.6% | |
| 48.02% | 379 | 1.4 | 483 | 8,495 | 49.1% | 47.1% | |
| 51.34% | 372 | 1.6 | 494 | 8,760 | 49.7% | 52.5% | |
| 45.48% | 354 | 1.5 | 520 | 9,365 | 53.0% | 40.9% | |
| 51.52% | 330 | 1.9 | 532 | 9,620 | 49.6% | 52.7% | |
| 50.55% | 273 | 1.5 | 491 | 9,352 | 46.5% | 52.9% | |
| 47.43% | 253 | 1.4 | 438 | 8,724 | 53.5% | 43.5% | |
| 51.25% | 240 | 1.5 | 514 | 8,992 | 59.8% | 44.9% | |
| 51.27% | 236 | 1.4 | 473 | 9,166 | 55.6% | 48.6% | |
| 52.99% | 234 | 1.8 | 583 | 9,269 | 44.9% | 58.8% | |
| 46.78% | 233 | 1.5 | 505 | 8,552 | 44.9% | 48.4% | |
| 56.71% | 231 | 2.3 | 516 | 9,486 | 57.0% | 56.6% | |
| 52.38% | 210 | 1.4 | 474 | 8,933 | 57.8% | 48.8% | |
| 51.91% | 183 | 1.4 | 485 | 8,324 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 55.87% | 179 | 1.5 | 395 | 8,910 | 64.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.07% | 179 | 5.3 | 741 | 11,324 | 50.0% | 54.8% | |
| 50.85% | 177 | 1.8 | 519 | 9,281 | 53.6% | 49.1% | |
| 56.02% | 166 | 1.5 | 509 | 9,267 | 54.0% | 57.6% | |
| 52.47% | 162 | 5.9 | 767 | 11,103 | 65.7% | 43.2% | |
| 51.59% | 157 | 1.6 | 475 | 9,652 | 61.7% | 47.3% | |
| 46.45% | 155 | 1.6 | 628 | 8,488 | 48.0% | 45.1% | |
| 48.37% | 153 | 1.6 | 474 | 9,703 | 51.2% | 47.3% | |
| 50.66% | 152 | 1.5 | 525 | 9,122 | 59.6% | 45.3% | |
| 54.86% | 144 | 1.4 | 490 | 9,332 | 53.6% | 55.7% | |
| 49.28% | 138 | 1.9 | 497 | 9,057 | 44.2% | 52.3% | |
| 55.38% | 130 | 1.4 | 494 | 8,785 | 50.0% | 58.8% | |
| 58.97% | 117 | 1.4 | 490 | 8,676 | 64.0% | 55.2% | |
| 55.65% | 115 | 1.4 | 537 | 9,048 | 52.2% | 58.0% | |
| 59.29% | 113 | 1.4 | 503 | 8,432 | 50.0% | 66.2% | |
| 52.43% | 103 | 1.4 | 509 | 9,357 | 60.0% | 47.6% | |
| 53.92% | 102 | 4.1 | 664 | 10,306 | 53.9% | 54.0% | |
| 54.55% | 99 | 5.9 | 776 | 10,626 | 46.1% | 63.8% | |
| 58.06% | 93 | 1.6 | 499 | 9,185 | 54.3% | 60.3% | |
| 57.30% | 89 | 1.4 | 491 | 8,643 | 61.4% | 53.3% | |
| 63.86% | 83 | 6.0 | 843 | 11,788 | 48.6% | 75.0% | |
| 53.25% | 77 | 5.7 | 739 | 10,901 | 55.9% | 51.2% | |
| 45.21% | 73 | 1.9 | 453 | 9,311 | 52.2% | 42.0% | |
| 36.11% | 72 | 1.5 | 498 | 8,981 | 33.3% | 38.1% | |
| 57.14% | 70 | 1.4 | 517 | 9,166 | 55.6% | 58.1% | |
| 61.54% | 65 | 6.0 | 780 | 11,063 | 69.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 3.8 | 663 | 9,747 | 68.2% | 40.5% | |
| 61.90% | 63 | 4.8 | 689 | 10,474 | 63.0% | 61.1% | |
| 47.54% | 61 | 2.7 | 616 | 10,421 | 27.3% | 59.0% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 6.0 | 785 | 11,471 | 45.8% | 50.0% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 6.1 | 816 | 12,187 | 57.1% | 61.3% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 1.4 | 560 | 8,846 | 60.9% | 48.1% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 1.8 | 494 | 9,589 | 42.9% | 53.9% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 1.5 | 433 | 9,572 | 46.1% | 42.4% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 5.3 | 720 | 12,609 | 25.0% | 64.9% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 6.3 | 677 | 11,997 | 35.3% | 66.7% | |
| 61.36% | 44 | 1.5 | 525 | 8,987 | 50.0% | 67.9% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 2.5 | 487 | 8,581 | 55.6% | 58.3% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 2.1 | 574 | 9,534 | 75.0% | 52.0% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 6.4 | 833 | 12,184 | 66.7% | 43.5% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 1.5 | 486 | 9,065 | 52.9% | 56.5% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 5.9 | 764 | 11,051 | 56.3% | 45.0% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 6.1 | 836 | 11,750 | 42.9% | 55.0% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 1.5 | 396 | 8,959 | 46.1% | 30.0% | |
| 66.67% | 33 | 5.3 | 648 | 11,491 | 90.9% | 54.5% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 6.1 | 838 | 10,191 | 70.6% | 35.7% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 6.5 | 805 | 12,368 | 36.4% | 64.7% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.2 | 801 | 12,689 | 40.0% | 44.4% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 5.3 | 629 | 11,185 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 2.3 | 678 | 9,318 | 44.4% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 1.3 | 441 | 8,169 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 30.43% | 23 | 4.1 | 622 | 9,771 | 36.4% | 25.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 5.5 | 769 | 11,545 | 55.6% | 53.9% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 5.4 | 624 | 10,764 | 55.6% | 72.7% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.7 | 529 | 8,468 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 3.9 | 598 | 9,822 | 85.7% | 66.7% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 1.6 | 552 | 10,138 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 3.2 | 589 | 10,240 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 3.7 | 551 | 9,690 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 5.8 | 731 | 11,383 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 4.7 | 715 | 10,510 | 42.9% | 22.2% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.4 | 772 | 10,436 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 4.4 | 495 | 9,892 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.8 | 781 | 13,250 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 2.7 | 488 | 9,771 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.2 | 641 | 8,957 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 4.3 | 566 | 10,349 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.5 | 728 | 8,314 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 3.1 | 529 | 9,020 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.3 | 645 | 9,246 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.0 | 578 | 10,201 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 7.0 | 832 | 13,374 | 80.0% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 2.1 | 532 | 10,545 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.1 | 341 | 7,539 | 71.4% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.9 | 685 | 9,294 | 62.5% | 0.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.6 | 459 | 7,067 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.4 | 604 | 10,174 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.9 | 632 | 9,442 | 28.6% | 75.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.3 | 784 | 13,529 | 75.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 829 | 12,078 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 4.2 | 612 | 8,413 | 57.1% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 951 | 11,600 | 100.0% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 515 | 9,324 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.6 | 666 | 11,017 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.1 | 673 | 10,884 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.3 | 749 | 11,248 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.1 | 705 | 11,069 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 475 | 10,682 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.9 | 566 | 7,685 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 958 | 11,977 | 66.7% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.0 | 502 | 10,972 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 1.9 | 586 | 10,112 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 2.5 | 660 | 9,161 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.5 | 466 | 7,900 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 697 | 10,723 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.8 | 555 | 10,279 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.0 | 714 | 11,497 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.9 | 626 | 11,099 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.3 | 605 | 6,626 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.2 | 637 | 11,147 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 538 | 9,829 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 723 | 12,208 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 326 | 10,515 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 513 | 8,257 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Seraphine vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Seraphine do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Cassiopeia wins the Seraphine vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 77.8% win rate compared to Seraphine's 22.2%, a 55.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 9 recent ranked games in patch 26.14.
How does Seraphine do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Cassiopeia has the advantage against Seraphine with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Cassiopeia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Seraphine do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Cassiopeia takes over the Seraphine vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 71.4% win rate compared to 28.6%. Cassiopeia scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Seraphine vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Cassiopeia wins the matchup against Seraphine with a 77.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.14. The 55.6 percentage point advantage means Cassiopeia is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 9 games analyzed.
What is the best Seraphine build against Cassiopeia?
The best Seraphine build against Cassiopeia includes Luden's Echo, Stormsurge, Imperial Mandate with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Seraphine runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Seraphine runes against Cassiopeia use the Sorcery primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Seraphine vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Seraphine counter Cassiopeia?
No, Seraphine struggles against Cassiopeia with only a 22.2% win rate. Cassiopeia has the advantage in this matchup. Seraphine players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Cassiopeia's lead.
How do I play Seraphine against Cassiopeia?
When playing Seraphine against Cassiopeia, play cautiously and avoid Cassiopeia's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Cassiopeia has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.